Literature DB >> 20514452

Genomic change of chromosome 8 predicts the response to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer.

Sehwan Han1, Kyeongmee Park, Eunah Shin, Hyun-Jung Kim, Jung Yeon Kim, Ji Young Kim, Geumhee Gwak.   

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate whether the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ductal-type breast cancer could be predicted by different genomic alterations. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was performed on samples from 15 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin plus docetaxel (ED). Frozen tissue bank samples were retrospectively selected from 8 patients who demonstrated complete pathologic response (pCR) and from 7 patients resistant to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We performed aCGH with 4,277 human bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones, scanning the genome for DNA copy number changes. In a cluster dendrogram of aCGH data, responders showed changes clustered in S940, S984, S44, S98, S130, S115, S478, and 1150T, whereas non-responder group changes clustered in S1029, S209, S219, S660, S133, S323, and S670. Compared to responders, non-responders showed more complicated genomic alterations; the most common gains were located at chromosome 8q (717%), 13q (71%), and 20q (57%), with the smallest regions of genomic gain at 8q24.3, 8q24.22, 8q24.21, 8q22.1, 8q22.2, 8q22.3, 13q21.1, 20q13.2, and 20q13.33. The most frequently deleted regions were observed on chromosome 8p (71%) and 17p (57%), with the smallest regions of deletion at 8p23.3, 8p23.2, 8p23.1, 8p21.3, 8p21.2, and 17p13.3. The results of the current study suggest that aberrations in chromosome 8 may contribute to the resistance to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ductal-type breast cancer. Results of our study indicate that candidate gene identification through aCGH should be validated by specific gene analysis since the sites of chromosomal aberration are quite different among studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20514452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1021-335X            Impact factor:   3.906


  8 in total

1.  Monosomy of chromosome 8 could be considered as a primary preneoplastic event in breast cancer: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Fabiola A García Parra-Pérez; Angel Zavala-Pompa; Javier Pacheco-Calleros; Elva I Cortés-Gutiérrez; Ricardo M Cerda-Flores; Sandra Lara-Miranda; Martha I Dávila-Rodríguez
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Amplification of chromosome 8q21-qter associated with the acquired paclitaxel resistance of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Wei Li; Yating You; Xiaowei Zhang; Yexun Song; Hong Xiang; Xiaowei Peng; Jiangbo Qin; Guolin Tan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-10-01

3.  8p deletion is strongly linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Lebok; A Mittenzwei; M Kluth; C Özden; B Taskin; K Hussein; K Möller; A Hartmann; A Lebeau; I Witzel; S Mahner; L Wölber; F Jänicke; S Geist; P Paluchowski; C Wilke; U Heilenkötter; R Simon; G Sauter; L Terracciano; R Krech; A von der Assen; V Müller; E Burandt
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.742

4.  A Panel of Genes Identified as Targets for 8q24.13-24.3 Gain Contributing to Unfavorable Overall Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kun Zhao; Yu Zhao; Jia-Yi Zhu; Hui Dong; Wen-Ming Cong; Yi Yu; Hui Wang; Zhong-Zheng Zhu; Qing Xu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

5.  Genetic variants in the Hippo pathway predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chao-Yuan Huang; Shu-Pin Huang; Victor C Lin; Chia-Cheng Yu; Ta-Yuan Chang; Shin-Hun Juang; Bo-Ying Bao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Gene expression profiling of the 8q22-24 position in human breast cancer: TSPYL5, MTDH, ATAD2 and CCNE2 genes are implicated in oncogenesis, while WISP1 and EXT1 genes may predict a risk of metastasis.

Authors:  Afsoon Taghavi; Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari; Mohammad Hashemi-Bahremani; Nahid Nafissi; Ahad Khalilnezhad; Seyed Mohammad Poorhosseini; Feyzollah Hashemi-Gorji; Vahid Reza Yassaee
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Case Report: Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells in a Triple Negative Spindle-Cell Metaplastic Breast Cancer Patient.

Authors:  Tania Rossi; Michela Palleschi; Davide Angeli; Michela Tebaldi; Giovanni Martinelli; Ivan Vannini; Maurizio Puccetti; Francesco Limarzi; Roberta Maltoni; Giulia Gallerani; Francesco Fabbri
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-24

8.  Establishment of two basal-like breast cancer cell lines with extremely low tumorigenicity from Taiwanese premenopausal women.

Authors:  Wen-Ling Kuo; Shir-Hwa Ueng; Chun-Hsing Wu; Li-Yu Lee; Yun-Shien Lee; Ming-Chin Yu; Shin-Cheh Chen; Chi-Chang Yu; Chi-Neu Tsai
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.