Literature DB >> 20514342

Testing an auditory illusion in frogs: Perceptual restoration or sensory bias?

Folkert Seeba1, Joshua J Schwartz, Mark A Bee.   

Abstract

The human auditory system perceptually restores short deleted segments of speech and other sounds (e.g. tones) when the resulting silent gaps are filled by a potential masking noise. When this phenomenon, known as 'auditory induction', occurs, listeners experience the illusion of hearing an ongoing sound continuing through the interrupting noise even though the perceived sound is not physically present. Such illusions suggest that a key function of the auditory system is to allow listeners to perceive complete auditory objects with incomplete acoustic information, as may often be the case in multisource acoustic environments. At present, however, we know little about the possible functions of auditory induction in the sound-mediated behaviours of animals. The present study used two-choice phonotaxis experiments to test the hypothesis that female grey treefrogs, Hyla chrysoscelis, experience the illusory perceptual restoration of discrete pulses in the male advertisement call when pulses are deleted and replaced by a potential masking noise. While added noise restored some attractiveness to calls with missing pulses, there was little evidence to suggest that the frogs actually experienced the illusion of perceiving the missing pulses. Instead, the added noise appeared to function as an acoustic appendage that made some calls more attractive than others as a result of sensory biases, the expression of which depended on the temporal order and acoustic structure of the added appendages.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20514342      PMCID: PMC2877208          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  35 in total

1.  Recognition of other individuals' social relationships by female baboons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Long-term temporal integration in the anuran auditory system.

Authors:  T B Alder; G J Rose
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs.

Authors:  Johannes Schul; Sarah L Bush
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The neurophysiological basis of the auditory continuity illusion: a mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Robert P Carlyon; Yury Shtyrov; Olaf Hauk; Tara Dodson; Friedemann Pullvermüller
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Auditory grouping.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Inadvertent social information in breeding site selection of natal dispersing birds.

Authors:  Joseph J Nocera; Graham J Forbes; Luc-Alain Giraldeau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Parallel female preferences for call duration in a diploid ancestor of an allotetraploid treefrog.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Roles of the auditory midbrain and thalamus in selective phonotaxis in female gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor).

Authors:  Heike Endepols; Albert S Feng; H Carl Gerhardt; Johannes Schul; Wolfgang Walkowiak
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Stimulus familiarity affects perceptual restoration in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  Folkert Seeba; Georg M Klump
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Sound source perception in anuran amphibians.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion.

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Michael J Ryan; Ximena E Bernal; A Stanley Rand; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Sensory biases in response to novel complex acoustic signals in male and female grey treefrogs, Hyla chrysoscelis.

Authors:  Michael S Reichert; Iván de la Hera
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Species-specificity of temporal processing in the auditory midbrain of gray treefrogs: interval-counting neurons.

Authors:  Gary J Rose; Jessica L Hanson; Christopher J Leary; Jalina A Graham; Rishi K Alluri; Gustavo A Vasquez-Opazo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.389

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.