Literature DB >> 20514164

Demand equations for qualitatively different foods under fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of three data conversions.

T Mary Foster1, Catherine E Sumpter, William Temple, Amanda Flevill, Alan Poling.   

Abstract

Concurrent schedules were used to establish 6 hens' preferences for three foods. The resulting biases suggested wheat was preferred over honey-puffed and puffed wheat, and puffed wheat was the least preferred food. The hens then responded under fixed-ratio schedules for each food in 40-min (excluding reinforcer time) sessions, with the response requirement doubling each session until no reinforcers were received. At the smaller ratios, the less preferred the food, the faster the hens' overall response rates (mainly as a result of shorter postreinforcement pauses) and the more reinforcers they received. The relations between the logarithms of the number of reinforcers obtained (consumption) and the response ratio (price) were well fitted by curvilinear demand functions. Wheat produced the smallest initial consumption (ln L), followed by honey-puffed and puffed wheat, respectively. The response requirement at which the demand functions predicted maximal responding (P(max)) were larger for wheat than for the other foods. Normalizing consumption and price, as suggested by Hursh and Winger (1995), moved the data for the three foods towards a single demand function; however, the P(max) values were generally largest for puffed wheat. The results of normalization, as suggested by Hursh and Silberberg (2008), depended on the k value used. The parameter k is related to the range of the data, and the same k value needs to be used for all data sets that are compared. A k value of 8.0 gave significantly higher essential values (smaller alpha values) for puffed wheat as compared to honey-puffed wheat and wheat, and the P(max) values, in normalized standard price units, were largest for puffed wheat. Normalizing demand by converting the puffed and honey-puffed wheat reinforcers to wheat equivalents (by applying the bias parameter from the concurrent-schedules procedure) maintained separate demand functions for the foods. Those for wheat had the smallest rates of change in elasticity (a) and, in contrast to the other analyses, the largest P(max) values. Normalizing demand in terms of concurrent-schedule preference appears to have some advantages and to merit further investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioral economics; concurrent schedules; demand functions; domestic hens; fixed-ratio schedules; key peck; magnitude-of-reinforcer; normalization; reinforcer quality

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20514164      PMCID: PMC2771669          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  24 in total

1.  Modeling drug consumption in the clinic using simulation procedures: demand for heroin and cigarettes in opioid-dependent outpatients.

Authors:  E A Jacobs; W K Bickel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Contingency discriminability, matching, and bias in the concurrent-schedule responding of possums (Trichosurus vulpecula).

Authors:  Angela Bron; Catherine E Sumpter; T Mary Foster; William Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Henry D Schlinger; Adam Derenne; Alan Baron
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2008

4.  Concurrent schedules: Quantifying the aversiveness of noise.

Authors:  T M McAdie; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers.

Authors:  V Hollard; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Electrical brain stimulation and food reinforcement dissociated by demand elasticity.

Authors:  S R Hursh; B H Natelson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1981-03

8.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Does package size matter? A unit-price analysis of "demand" for food in baboons.

Authors:  R W Foltin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Economic analysis of the effects of caloric alternatives and reinforcer magnitude on "demand" for food in baboons.

Authors:  R W Foltin
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.868

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of economy type and nicotine on the essential value of food in rats.

Authors:  Rachel N Cassidy; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effects of session length on demand functions generated using FR schedules.

Authors:  T Mary Foster; Jennifer Kinloch; Alan Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of a signaled delay to reinforcement in the previous and upcoming ratios on between-ratio pausing in fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  Aimee Harris; T Mary Foster; Joshua Levine; William Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.