Literature DB >> 20513887

Femoral diaphyseal endoprosthetic reconstruction after segmental resection of primary bone tumours.

S A Hanna1, M D Sewell, W J S Aston, R C Pollock, J A Skinner, S R Cannon, T W R Briggs.   

Abstract

Segmental resection of malignant bone disease in the femoral diaphysis with subsequent limb reconstruction is a major undertaking. This is a retrospective review of 23 patients who had undergone limb salvage by endoprosthetic replacement of the femoral diaphysis for a primary bone tumour between 1989 and 2005. There were 16 males and seven females, with a mean age of 41.3 years (10 to 68). The mean overall follow-up was for 97 months (3 to 240), and 120 months (42 to 240) for the living patients. The cumulative patient survival was 77% (95% confidence interval 63% to 95%) at ten years. Survival of the implant, with failure of the endoprosthesis as an endpoint, was 85% at five years and 68% (95% confidence interval 42% to 92%) at ten years. The revision rate was 22% and the overall rate of re-operation was 26%. Complications included deep infection (4%), breakage of the prosthesis (8%), periprosthetic fracture (4%), aseptic loosening (4%), local recurrence (4%) and metastases (17%). The 16 patients who retained their diaphyseal endoprosthesis had a mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score of 87% (67% to 93%). They were all able to comfortably perform most activities of daily living. Femoral diaphyseal endoprosthetic replacement is a viable option for reconstruction following segmental resection of malignant bone disease. It allows immediate weight-bearing, is associated with a good long-term functional outcome, has an acceptable complication and revision rate and, most importantly, does not appear to compromise patient survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20513887     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B6.23449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  31 in total

1.  Development of non-invasive Raman spectroscopy for in vivo evaluation of bone graft osseointegration in a rat model.

Authors:  Paul I Okagbare; Francis W L Esmonde-White; Steven A Goldstein; Michael D Morris
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.616

2.  Causes and Frequencies of Reoperations After Endoprosthetic Reconstructions for Extremity Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patrick Thornley; Matias Vicente; Austin MacDonald; Nathan Evaniew; Michelle Ghert; Roberto Velez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Intercalary reconstructions after bone tumor resections: a review of treatments.

Authors:  Georgios N Panagopoulos; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Cyril Mauffrey; Jan Lesenský; Andrea Angelini; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Vasilios G Igoumenou; John Papanastassiou; Olga Savvidou; Pietro Ruggieri; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-05

4.  Is the Induced-membrane Technique Successful for Limb Reconstruction After Resecting Large Bone Tumors in Children?

Authors:  Frank Fitoussi; Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Outcomes of a Modular Intercalary Endoprosthesis as Treatment for Segmental Defects of the Femur, Tibia, and Humerus.

Authors:  Joseph Benevenia; Rainer Kirchner; Francis Patterson; Kathleen Beebe; Dieter C Wirtz; Steven Rivero; Mark Palma; Max J Friedrich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Intercalary frozen autograft for reconstruction of malignant bone and soft tissue tumours.

Authors:  Karem M Zekry; Norio Yamamoto; Katsuhiro Hayashi; Akihiko Takeuchi; Takashi Higuchi; Kensaku Abe; Yuta Taniguchi; Ali Zein A A Alkhooly; Ahmed Saleh Abd-Elfattah; Ezzat H Fouly; Adel Refaat Ahmed; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  [Subtrochanteric renal cell carcinoma metastasis: implantation of a femoral head preserving prosthesis].

Authors:  A S Spiro; L Grossterlinden; J Zustin; J M Rueger; M H Priemel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Failure rates and functional results for intercalary femur reconstructions after tumour resection.

Authors:  J I Albergo; L C Gaston; G L Farfalli; M Laitinen; M Parry; M A Ayerza; M Risk; L M Jeys; L A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-08

9.  Custom-made intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction for a parosteal osteosarcoma of the femoral diaphysis: A case report.

Authors:  Shi-Chang Zhao; Chang-Qing Zhang; Chun-Lin Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  [Bone defect reconstruction in bone sarcoma surgery: tumour endoprosthesis versus biological reconstruction].

Authors:  A Streitbürger; G Gosheger; R Dieckmann; M Nottrott; H Ahrens; J Hardes
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.