Literature DB >> 20513164

Biotechnological strategies to overcome inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates for ethanol production: review.

W Parawira1, M Tekere.   

Abstract

One of the major challenges faced in commercial production of lignocellulosic bioethanol is the inhibitory compounds generated during the thermo-chemical pre-treatment step of biomass. These inhibitory compounds are toxic to fermenting micro-organisms. The ethanol yield and productivity obtained during fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates is decreased due to the presence of inhibiting compounds, such as weak acids, furans and phenolic compounds formed or released during thermo-chemical pre-treatment step such as acid and steam explosion. This review describes the application and/or effect of biological detoxification (removal of inhibitors before fermentation) or use of bioreduction capability of fermenting yeasts on the fermentability of the hydrolysates. Inhibition of yeast fermentation by the inhibitor compounds in the lignocellulosic hydrolysates can be reduced by treatment with enzymes such as the lignolytic enzymes, for example, laccase and micro-organisms such as Trichoderma reesei, Coniochaeta ligniaria NRRL30616, Trametes versicolor, Pseudomonas putida Fu1, Candida guilliermondii, and Ureibacillus thermosphaericus. Microbial and enzymatic detoxifications of lignocellulosic hydrolysate are mild and more specific in their action. The efficiency of enzymatic process is quite comparable to other physical and chemical methods. Adaptation of the fermentation yeasts to the lignocellulosic hydrolysate prior to fermentation is suggested as an alternative approach to detoxification. Increases in fermentation rate and ethanol yield by adapted micro-organisms to acid pre-treated lignocellulosic hydrolysates have been reported in some studies. Another approach to alleviate the inhibition problem is to use genetic engineering to introduce increased tolerance by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, for example, by overexpressing genes encoding enzymes for resistance against specific inhibitors and altering co-factor balance. Cloning of the laccase gene followed by heterologous expression in yeasts was shown to provide higher enzyme yields and permit production of laccases with desired properties for detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates. A combination of more inhibitor-tolerant yeast strains with efficient feed strategies such as fed-batch will likely improve lignocellulose-to-ethanol process robustness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20513164     DOI: 10.3109/07388551003757816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Biotechnol        ISSN: 0738-8551            Impact factor:   8.429


  61 in total

1.  Genetic engineering and enzyme research in lignocellulosic ethanol production.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jane Ashforth
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 14.870

2.  Repeated cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SC90 to tolerate inhibitors generated during cassava processing waste hydrolysis for bioethanol production.

Authors:  Pakathamon Palakawong Na Ayutthaya; Theppanya Charoenrat; Warawut Krusong; Soisuda Pornpukdeewattana
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  Glyoxal oxidases: their nature and properties.

Authors:  Marianne Daou; Craig B Faulds
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Comparison of the efficiency of bacterial and fungal laccases in delignification and detoxification of steam-pretreated lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production.

Authors:  María De La Torre; Raquel Martín-Sampedro; Úrsula Fillat; María E Eugenio; Alba Blánquez; Manuel Hernández; María E Arias; David Ibarra
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Extractive fermentation for enhanced production of thailandepsin A from Burkholderia thailandensis E264 using polyaromatic adsorbent resin Diaion HP-20.

Authors:  Bing Liu; Junyuan Hui; Yi-Qiang Cheng; Xuehong Zhang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  A TRP5/5-fluoroanthranilic acid counter-selection system for gene disruption in Candida guilliermondii.

Authors:  Emilien Foureau; Marc Clastre; Yoann Millerioux; Andrew J Simkin; Lucie Cornet; Christelle Dutilleul; Sébastien Besseau; Emeline Marais; Céline Melin; Jérôme Guillard; Joël Crèche; Nathalie Giglioli-Guivarc'h; Vincent Courdavault; Nicolas Papon
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.886

7.  Obtaining hemicellulosic hydrolysate from sugarcane bagasse for microbial oil production by Lipomyces starkeyi.

Authors:  Michelle da Cunha Abreu Xavier; Telma Teixeira Franco
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 2.461

8.  Increase in furfural tolerance in ethanologenic Escherichia coli LY180 by plasmid-based expression of thyA.

Authors:  Huabao Zheng; Xuan Wang; Lorraine P Yomano; Keelnatham T Shanmugam; Lonnie O Ingram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Isolation and characterization of Paenibacillus polymyxa LY214, a camptothecin-producing endophytic bacterium from Camptotheca acuminata.

Authors:  Xiang Pu; Fei Chen; Yun Yang; Xixing Qu; Guolin Zhang; Yinggang Luo
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 3.346

10.  Improving Escherichia coli FucO for furfural tolerance by saturation mutagenesis of individual amino acid positions.

Authors:  Huabao Zheng; Xuan Wang; Lorraine P Yomano; Ryan D Geddes; Keelnatham T Shanmugam; Lonnie O Ingram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.