PURPOSE: Most prostate, colon and breast cancer cells are resistant to growth inhibitory effects of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). We have examined whether the high oxidative stress in these cells causes a loss of SAHA activity and if so, whether pretreatment with an anti-oxidant can sensitize these cells to SAHA. METHODS: A DNA-Hoechst dye fluorescence measured cell growth and dichlorfluorescein-diacetate (DCF-DA) dye fluorescence measured reactive oxygen species (ROS). Growth inhibitory and ROS-generating activities of SAHA in androgen-treated or untreated LNCaP cells and PC-3 prostate cancer cells, HT-29 and HCT-115 colon cancer cells, MDA-MB231 breast cancer cells and A549 and NCI-H460 lung cancer cells with or without pretreatment with an anti-oxidant Vitamin E was determined. SAHA activity against LNCaP cells treated with another anti-oxidant N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) was also determined. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was used to determine intracellular SAHA level. RESULTS: SAHA treatment markedly inhibits LNCaP cell growth, when the cells are at a low ROS level. SAHA is, however, inactive against the same cell line, when the cells are at a high ROS level. A significant decrease in SAHA level was observed in LNCaP cells with high ROS after 24- and 72-h treatment when compared to cells with low ROS. Vitamin E pretreatment that reduces cellular ROS, synergistically sensitizes oxidatively stressed LNCaP, PC-3, HT-29, HCT-115 and MDA-MB231 cells, but not the A-549 and NCI-H460 cells with low ROS to SAHA. NAC treatment also sensitized androgen-treated LNCaP cells to the growth inhibitory effects of SAHA. CONCLUSION: Response to SAHA could be improved by combining anti-oxidants such as Vitamin E with SAHA for the treatment of oxidatively stressed human malignancies that are otherwise resistant to SAHA.
PURPOSE: Most prostate, colon and breast cancer cells are resistant to growth inhibitory effects of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). We have examined whether the high oxidative stress in these cells causes a loss of SAHA activity and if so, whether pretreatment with an anti-oxidant can sensitize these cells to SAHA. METHODS: A DNA-Hoechst dye fluorescence measured cell growth and dichlorfluorescein-diacetate (DCF-DA) dye fluorescence measured reactive oxygen species (ROS). Growth inhibitory and ROS-generating activities of SAHA in androgen-treated or untreated LNCaP cells and PC-3prostate cancer cells, HT-29 and HCT-115colon cancer cells, MDA-MB231breast cancer cells and A549 and NCI-H460 lung cancer cells with or without pretreatment with an anti-oxidant Vitamin E was determined. SAHA activity against LNCaP cells treated with another anti-oxidant N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) was also determined. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was used to determine intracellular SAHA level. RESULTS:SAHA treatment markedly inhibits LNCaP cell growth, when the cells are at a low ROS level. SAHA is, however, inactive against the same cell line, when the cells are at a high ROS level. A significant decrease in SAHA level was observed in LNCaP cells with high ROS after 24- and 72-h treatment when compared to cells with low ROS. Vitamin E pretreatment that reduces cellular ROS, synergistically sensitizes oxidatively stressed LNCaP, PC-3, HT-29, HCT-115 and MDA-MB231 cells, but not the A-549 and NCI-H460 cells with low ROS to SAHA. NAC treatment also sensitized androgen-treated LNCaP cells to the growth inhibitory effects of SAHA. CONCLUSION: Response to SAHA could be improved by combining anti-oxidants such as Vitamin E with SAHA for the treatment of oxidatively stressed humanmalignancies that are otherwise resistant to SAHA.
Authors: J S Ungerstedt; Y Sowa; W-S Xu; Y Shao; M Dokmanovic; G Perez; L Ngo; A Holmgren; X Jiang; P A Marks Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-01-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: William Kevin Kelly; Owen A O'Connor; Lee M Krug; Judy H Chiao; Mark Heaney; Tracy Curley; Barbara MacGregore-Cortelli; William Tong; J Paul Secrist; Lawrence Schwartz; Stacy Richardson; Elaina Chu; Semra Olgac; Paul A Marks; Howard Scher; Victoria M Richon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J S Horoszewicz; S S Leong; E Kawinski; J P Karr; H Rosenthal; T M Chu; E A Mirand; G P Murphy Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1983-04 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: L Xiao; P Celano; A R Mank; C Griffin; E W Jabs; A L Hawkins; R A Casero Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1992-09-30 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Ferdinando Chiaradonna; Iros Barozzi; Claudia Miccolo; Gabriele Bucci; Roberta Palorini; Lorenzo Fornasari; Oronza A Botrugno; Giancarlo Pruneri; Michele Masullo; Alfonso Passafaro; Viviana E Galimberti; Valeria R Fantin; Victoria M Richon; Salvatore Pece; Giuseppe Viale; Pier Paolo Di Fiore; Giulio Draetta; Pier Giuseppe Pelicci; Saverio Minucci; Susanna Chiocca Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Peter M Wilson; Melissa J Labonte; Shelby C Martin; Stephanie T Kuwahara; Anthony El-Khoueiry; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Robert D Ladner Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Karem H Alzoubi; Omar F Khabour; Aya G Jaber; Sayer I Al-Azzam; Nizar M Mhaidat; Majed M Masadeh Journal: Cytotechnology Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Murat Bingul; Owen Tan; Christopher R Gardner; Selina K Sutton; Greg M Arndt; Glenn M Marshall; Belamy B Cheung; Naresh Kumar; David StC Black Journal: Molecules Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Murat Bingul; Greg M Arndt; Glenn M Marshall; Belamy B Cheung; Naresh Kumar; David StC Black Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 4.411