Literature DB >> 20511038

Three femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of fixation on the lateral cortex versus the anterior cortex.

Chad S Conner1, Brandon A Perez, Randal P Morris, James W Buckner, William L Buford, Frank M Ivey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical properties of 3 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction femoral fixation devices in a porcine model with implantation on both the lateral femoral cortex and the anterior femoral cortex.
METHODS: ACL reconstructions with an 8-mm porcine tendon graft were performed on 48 porcine femurs with the EndoButton CL (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA), ToggleLoc with ZipLoop technology (Biomet Sports Medicine, Warsaw, IN), or EZLoc (Biomet Sports Medicine). In 8 specimens for each implant, the femoral tunnel was drilled from the 10:30 surgical position out the lateral cortex. In another 8 specimens for each implant, the tunnel was drilled from the 10:30 position to a standardized anterior femoral surface. Cyclic testing was performed on an MTS testing machine (MTS, Eden Prairie, MN) from 50 N to 450 N for 2,000 cycles, followed by load-to-failure testing in specimens that survived. The cortical thickness and location of the implant exit were recorded.
RESULTS: In the lateral femur group, 0 of the EZLoc devices, 2 of the ToggleLoc devices, and 3 of the EndoButtons completed cyclic testing. In the anterior femur group, 1 of the EZLoc devices, 5 of the ToggleLoc devices, and 5 of the EndoButtons completed cyclic testing (P = .012). In the anterior femur group, the ToggleLoc exhibited higher 2,000-cycle elongation (5.46 +/- 1 mm) than the EndoButton (3.55 +/- 0.6 mm) (P = .005). The EndoButton showed a higher first failure load (1,190.9 +/- 150.0 N) than the ToggleLoc (912.6 +/- 82.4 N) (P = .007). The anterior cortex (1.4 mm) was thinner than the lateral cortex (1.7 mm) (P = .0002).
CONCLUSIONS: The EndoButton provided the strongest ACL femoral fixation with significantly less graft-implant elongation and significantly higher failure loads. It was also shown in a porcine model that implants on the anterior cortical surface perform better than those on the lateral surface. Increased cortical thickness, in the range tested, was not associated with improved implant performance in the porcine model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The EndoButton provided the best ACL femoral fixation of the devices tested. Copyright (c) 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20511038     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  19 in total

1.  The effect of tunnel placement on rotational stability after ACL reconstruction: evaluation with use of triaxial accelerometry in a porcine model.

Authors:  Aníbal Debandi; Akira Maeyama; Yuichi Hoshino; Shigehiro Asai; Bunsei Goto; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical comparison of three anatomic ACL reconstructions in a porcine model.

Authors:  Aníbal Debandi; Akira Maeyama; Songcen Lu; Chad Hume; Shigehiro Asai; Bunsei Goto; Yuichi Hoshino; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Fixation of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture with the use of a suspensory fixation.

Authors:  Anthony Wajsfisz; Konstantinos G Makridis; Jean-Yves Van Den Steene; Patrick Djian
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Femoral fixation of hamstring tendon grafts in ACL reconstructions: the 2-year follow-up results of a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Jon Olav Drogset; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Grete Sofie Hortemo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Peri-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction femur fracture: a biomechanical analysis of the femoral tunnel as a stress riser.

Authors:  Yung Han; Zeeshan Sardar; Scott McGrail; Thomas Steffen; Paul A Martineau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Posterior Wall Blowout During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Suspensory Cortical Fixation With a Screw and Washer Post.

Authors:  Justin J Mitchell; Jorge Chahla; Chase S Dean; Travis J Menge; Alexander R Vap; Tyler R Cram; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-05-30

7.  Comparison of Fixed- and Variable-Loop Button Fixation in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Vijay Chandru; Santhosh M S; Sujana Theja J S; Rohit R Nair
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-17

8.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Clinical Study Between Adjustable and Fixed Length Suspension Devices.

Authors:  Bastian Uribe-Echevarria; Justin A Magnuson; Annunziato Amendola; Matthew J Bollier; Brian R Wolf; Carolyn M Hettrich
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

9.  Anterior cruciate ligament graft tensioning. Is the maximal sustained one-handed pull technique reproducible?

Authors:  Barry J O'Neill; Fergus J Byrne; Kieran M Hirpara; William F Brennan; Peter E McHugh; William Curtin
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-07-20

Review 10.  Adjustable Loop Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sarvpreet Singh; Shalin Shaunak; Sebastian C K Shaw; John L Anderson; Vipul Mandalia
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.