Literature DB >> 17538175

Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III status defines clinically distinct subtypes of glioblastoma.

Christopher E Pelloski1, Karla V Ballman, Alfred F Furth, Li Zhang, E Lin, Erik P Sulman, Krishna Bhat, J Matthew McDonald, W K Alfred Yung, Howard Colman, Shiao Y Woo, Amy B Heimberger, Dima Suki, Michael D Prados, Susan M Chang, Fred G Barker, Jan C Buckner, C David James, Kenneth Aldape.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The clinical significance of epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) expression in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and its relationship with other key molecular markers are not clear. We sought to evaluate the clinical significance of GBM subtypes as defined by EGFRvIII status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The expression of EGFRvIII was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 649 patients with newly diagnosed GBM. These data were then examined in conjunction with the expression of phospho-intermediates (in a subset of these patients) of downstream AKT and Ras pathways and YKL-40 as well as with known clinical risk factors, including the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group's recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG-RPA) class.
RESULTS: The RTOG-RPA class was highly predictive of survival in EGFRvIII-negative patients but much less predictive in EGFRvIII-positive patients. These findings were seen in both an initial test set (n = 268) and a larger validation set (n = 381). Similarly, activation of the AKT/MAPK pathways and YKL-40 positivity were predictive of poor outcome in EGFRvIII-negative patients but not in EGFRvIII-positive patients. Pair-wise combinations of markers identified EGFRvIII and YKL-40 as prognostically important. In particular, outcome in patients with EGFRvIII-negative/YKL-40-negative tumors was significantly better than the outcome in patients with the other three combinations of these two markers.
CONCLUSION: Established prognostic factors in GBM were not predictive of outcome in the EGFRvIII-positive subset, although this requires confirmation in independent data sets. GBMs negative for both EGFRvIII and YKL-40 show less aggressive behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17538175     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.0705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  122 in total

1.  Immunologic escape after prolonged progression-free survival with epidermal growth factor receptor variant III peptide vaccination in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  John H Sampson; Amy B Heimberger; Gary E Archer; Kenneth D Aldape; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman; Mark R Gilbert; James E Herndon; Roger E McLendon; Duane A Mitchell; David A Reardon; Raymond Sawaya; Robert J Schmittling; Weiming Shi; James J Vredenburgh; Darell D Bigner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Serum YKL-40 is a marker of prognosis and disease status in high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Fabio M Iwamoto; Andreas F Hottinger; Sasan Karimi; Elyn Riedel; Jocelynn Dantis; Maryam Jahdi; Katherine S Panageas; Andrew B Lassman; Lauren E Abrey; Martin Fleisher; Lisa M DeAngelis; Eric C Holland; Adília Hormigo
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Nuclear EGFRvIII-STAT5b complex contributes to glioblastoma cell survival by direct activation of the Bcl-XL promoter.

Authors:  Khatri Latha; Ming Li; Vaibhav Chumbalkar; Anupama Gururaj; YeoHyeon Hwang; Sumana Dakeng; Raymond Sawaya; Kenneth Aldape; Webster K Cavenee; Oliver Bogler; Frank B Furnari
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Rindopepimut: anti-EGFRvIII peptide vaccine, oncolytic.

Authors:  Patrick C Gedeon; Bryan D Choi; John H Sampson; Darell D Bigner
Journal:  Drugs Future       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.148

5.  Epidermal growth factor receptor vIII expression in U87 glioblastoma cells alters their proteasome composition, function, and response to irradiation.

Authors:  Kwanghee Kim; James M Brush; Philip A Watson; Nicholas A Cacalano; Keisuke S Iwamoto; William H McBride
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 6.  Molecularly targeted therapies for malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Andreas A Argyriou; Haralabos P Kalofonos
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 7.  Treating recurrent glioblastoma: an update.

Authors:  Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015

Review 8.  Potential role of chitinase 3-like-1 in inflammation-associated carcinogenic changes of epithelial cells.

Authors:  Katrin Eurich; Mayuko Segawa; Satoko Toei-Shimizu; Emiko Mizoguchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Tumor prognostic factors and the challenge of developing predictive factors.

Authors:  Emma B Holliday; Erik P Sulman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  Molecularly targeted therapies for malignant glioma: rationale for combinatorial strategies.

Authors:  Nikhil G Thaker; Ian F Pollack
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.618

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.