Literature DB >> 20509791

Female genital cosmetic surgery: a critical review of current knowledge and contemporary debates.

Virginia Braun1.   

Abstract

Female genital cosmetic surgery procedures have gained popularity in the West in recent years. Marketing by surgeons promotes the surgeries, but professional organizations have started to question the promotion and practice of these procedures. Despite some surgeon claims of drastic transformations of psychological, emotional, and sexual life associated with the surgery, little reliable evidence of such effects exists. This article achieves two objectives. First, reviewing the published academic work on the topic, it identifies the current state of knowledge around female genital cosmetic procedures, as well as limitations in our knowledge. Second, examining a body of critical scholarship that raises sociological and psychological concerns not typically addressed in medical literature, it summarizes broader issues and debates. Overall, the article demonstrates a paucity of scientific knowledge and highlights a pressing need to consider the broader ramifications of surgical practices. "Today we have a whole society held in thrall to the drastic plastic of labial rejuvenation."( 1 ) "At the present time, the field of female cosmetic genital surgery is like the old Wild, Wild West: wide open and unregulated"( 2 ).

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20509791     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  17 in total

Review 1.  It is as it does: genital form and function in sex reassignment surgery.

Authors:  Eric D Plemons
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2014-03

2.  The geriatric clinic: dry and limp: aging queers, zombies, and sexual reanimation.

Authors:  Shaka McGlotten; Lisa Jean Moore
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2013-06

3.  Psychosexual outcome after labiaplasty: a prospective case-comparison study.

Authors:  David Veale; Iona Naismith; Ertiniss Eshkevari; Nell Ellison; Ana Costa; Dudley Robinson; Lanka Abeywickrama; Angelica Kavouni; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Individual male perception of female genitalia.

Authors:  Emma Horrocks; Jay Iyer; Althea Askern; Nadine Becuzzi; Venkat N Vangaveti; Ajay Rane
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Labia minora hypertrophy: causes, impact on women's health, and treatment options.

Authors:  Caterina Gulia; Andrea Zangari; Vito Briganti; Zhoobin H Bateni; Alessandro Porrello; Roberto Piergentili
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The Attitude of Physicians Towards Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery.

Authors:  Dana Sawan; Malak Al-Marghoub; Ghaliah H Abduljabar; Mohammed Al-Marghoub; Faisal Kashgari; Nashwa Aldardeir; Hassan S Abduljabbar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-11

7.  "I Don't See That as a Medical Problem": Clinicians' Attitudes and Responses to Requests for Cosmetic Genital Surgery by Adolescents.

Authors:  Merle Spriggs; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 1.352

8.  In their own words: a qualitative content analysis of women's and men's preferences for women's genitals.

Authors:  Margo Mullinax; Debby Herbenick; Vanessa Schick; Stephanie A Sanders; Michael Reece
Journal:  Sex Educ       Date:  2015-05-21

9.  Enhancing Gender.

Authors:  Hazem Zohny; Brian D Earp; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  An analysis of the content and clinical implications of online advertisements for female genital cosmetic surgery.

Authors:  Lih-Mei Liao; Neda Taghinejadi; Sarah M Creighton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.