Literature DB >> 24448726

Psychosexual outcome after labiaplasty: a prospective case-comparison study.

David Veale1, Iona Naismith, Ertiniss Eshkevari, Nell Ellison, Ana Costa, Dudley Robinson, Lanka Abeywickrama, Angelica Kavouni, Linda Cardozo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our goal was to determine psychosexual outcome after labiaplasty in the long-term with specific measures of genital body image and sexual dysfunction.
METHOD: We conducted a prospective study with a matched-comparison group of women not wanting labiaplasty. Forty-nine women were compared against a group of 39 women matched for age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, and marital status. The labiaplasty group was assessed before, 3 months after and between 11 and 42 months after surgery. The comparison group was assessed at two time points 3 months apart to control for the passage of time. The primary outcome measure was the Genital Appearance Satisfaction (GAS) scale.
RESULTS: Of the 49 women receiving labiaplasty, 19 (38.8 %) were lost to follow-up but were reassessed clinically. Twenty-four of 25 (96 %) women in the labiaplasty group showed a reliable and clinically significant improvement on the GAS scale 3 months after the procedure; 21/23 (91.3 %) showed an improvement at the long-term follow-up. A large effect size was found for improvements on the GAS scale in the labiaplasty group. Small-effect sizes were found for improvements in sexual functioning. Nine women obtaining labiaplasty met diagnostic criteria for body dysmorphic disorder before the operation; eight lost that diagnosis at the 3-month follow-up; 26 % reported minor side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Labiaplasty is effective in improving genital appearance and sexual satisfaction, but larger studies are required to determine the prevalence of potential side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24448726     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2297-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  22 in total

1.  Development of a Cosmetic Procedure Screening Questionnaire (COPS) for Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Authors:  D Veale; N Ellison; T G Werner; R Dodhia; M A Serfaty; A Clarke
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Female genital cosmetic and plastic surgery: a review.

Authors:  Michael P Goodman
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Psychological characteristics and motivation of women seeking labiaplasty.

Authors:  D Veale; E Eshkevari; N Ellison; A Costa; D Robinson; A Kavouni; L Cardozo
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Clinical characteristics of well women seeking labial reduction surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  N S Crouch; R Deans; L Michala; L-M Liao; S M Creighton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Body dysmorphic disorder. A survey of fifty cases.

Authors:  D Veale; A Boocock; K Gournay; W Dryden; F Shah; R Willson; J Walburn
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  R G Rogers; D Kammerer-Doak; A Villarreal; K Coates; C Qualls
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Surgical and minimally invasive cosmetic procedures among persons with body dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  Canice E Crerand; William Menard; Katharine A Phillips
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

9.  Cosmetic rhinoplasty in body dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  D Veale; L De Haro; C Lambrou
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2003-09

10.  Validation of genital appearance satisfaction scale and the cosmetic procedure screening scale for women seeking labiaplasty.

Authors:  David Veale; Ertimiss Eshkevari; Nell Ellison; Linda Cardozo; Dudley Robinson; Angelica Kavouni
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.949

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Labiaplasty: motivation, techniques, and ethics.

Authors:  Müjde Özer; Indiana Mortimore; Elise P Jansma; Margriet G Mullender
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  "I Don't See That as a Medical Problem": Clinicians' Attitudes and Responses to Requests for Cosmetic Genital Surgery by Adolescents.

Authors:  Merle Spriggs; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Sexual Functioning and Behavior of Men with Body Dysmorphic Disorder Concerning Penis Size Compared with Men Anxious about Penis Size and with Controls: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  David Veale; Sarah Miles; Julie Read; Andrea Troglia; Kevan Wylie; Gordon Muir
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.491

Review 4.  Cosmetic labiaplasty on minors: a review of current trends and evidence.

Authors:  Andreas Kalampalikis; Lina Michala
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 5.  The Safe Practice of Female Genital Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Heather J Furnas; Francisco L Canales; Rachel A Pedreira; Carly Comer; Samuel J Lin; Paul E Banwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.