Literature DB >> 20508553

Revision of cannulated and perforated cement-augmented pedicle screws: a biomechanical study in human cadavers.

Viola Bullmann1, Werner Schmoelz, Marcus Richter, Corinna Grathwohl, Tobias L Schulte.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Biomechanical investigation of primary and revised cement-augmented pedicle screws in comparison with unaugmented screws.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate revision of cannulated pedicle screws and investigate cement-augmented and nonaugmented screws biomechanically, testing the torque of primary screws and axial pullout force of revised screws in cadaver vertebrae. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cement augmentation increases the pullout force and stability of pedicle screws in vertebrae with low bone mineral density, but surgeons are concerned about complications during revision.
METHODS: Bone mineral density was measured using quantitative computed tomography (CT) in 23 osteoporotic thoracolumbar junction vertebrae from human cadavers. Cannulated pedicle screws, augmented with bone cement (on right) or unaugmented (left), were inserted into each vertebra. After CT control, extraction torque was measured and the pedicles were reinstrumented with larger-diameter screws. The right screws were augmented again, with another CT control, before pullout testing.
RESULTS: Mean vertebral bone density was 52.6 mg/cm. No major screw malpositioning was observed on primary CTs. Cement leakage was observed anterolaterally and into the spinal canal. Mean maximal torque in augmented screws (1.2 Nm, SD: 0.6) differed significantly from nonaugmented screws (0.8 Nm, SD: 0.6). Screw removal did not lead to vertebral destruction. No relevant changes due to positioning or leakage were observed on CT after revision procedures compared with primary findings. Maximal pullout force in revised augmented screws (713.2 N, SD: 254.6) differed significantly compared with nonaugmented screws (554.0 N, SD: 296.5). Bone damage was observed in several vertebrae during pullout force testing in augmented screws.
CONCLUSION: Revision of cement-augmented pedicle screws was feasible without bone destruction, and larger-diameter screws can be used in revision procedures. The pullout force after revision was significantly better in cement-augmented screws. During pullout testing, the cement-bone interface broke before the screw-cement interface in several vertebrae, fracturing the pedicles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20508553     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6ec60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  24 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of a posterior non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; Stefanie Erhart; Stefan Unger; Alexander C Disch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Pedicle screw augmentation from a biomechanical perspective].

Authors:  V Bullmann; U R Liljenqvist; R Rödl; T L Schulte
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Percutaneous techniques in the thoracic and lumbar spine].

Authors:  T R Blattert; S Katscher; C Josten
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.

Authors:  Richard Bostelmann; Alexander Keiler; Hans Jakob Steiger; Armin Scholz; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [Hardware removal after spinal instrumentation].

Authors:  H C Baron; B G Ochs; F M Stuby; U Stöckle; A Badke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  [Cement augmentation of pedicle screws : Pros and cons].

Authors:  K J Schnake; T R Blattert; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Augmented posterior instrumentation for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures].

Authors:  D Krappinger; T J Kastenberger; R Schmid
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Cement-augmented screws in a cervical two-level corpectomy with anterior titanium mesh cage reconstruction: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé; Anja Tschugg; Johannes Paesold; Pujan Kavakebi; Werner Schmölz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Failure of cement-augmented pedicle screws in the osteoporotic spine: a case report.

Authors:  Addisu Mesfin; Christopher B Komanski; A Jay Khanna
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

10.  Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing.

Authors:  Rebecca A Kueny; Jan P Kolb; Wolfgang Lehmann; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Gerd Huber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.