Literature DB >> 20506961

Dark-adapted pupil diameter as a function of age measured with the NeurOptics pupillometer.

Jay C Bradley1, Karl C Bentley, Aleem I Mughal, Hari Bodhireddy, Sandra M Brown.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the dark-adapted pupil diameter of normal research participants in their second through ninth decades of life using the NeurOptics pupillometer (Neuroptics Inc).
METHODS: Individuals aged 18 to 80 years with no history of eye disease or injury, intraocular surgery, or use of systemic antihistamines or opiates were recruited. After 2 minutes of adaptation at 1 lux illumination, the right dark-adapted pupil diameter was measured using the NeurOptics pupillometer, with accommodation controlled by distance fixation. The NeurOptics pupillometer reported a mean dark-adapted pupil diameter and a standard deviation of the mean, which were analyzed as a function of age-decade.
RESULTS: Two-hundred sixty-three individuals participated. For participants aged 18 to 19 years (n=6), the mean dark-adapted pupil diameter was 6.85 mm (range: 5.6 to 7.5 mm); 20 to 29 years (n=66), 7.33 mm (range: 5.7 to 8.8 mm); 30 to 39 years (n=50), 6.64 mm (range: 5.3 to 8.7 mm); 40 to 49 years (n=51), 6.15 mm (range: 4.5 to 8.2 mm); 50 to 59 years (n=50), 5.77 mm (range: 4.4 to 7.2 mm); 60 to 69 years (n=30), 5.58 mm (range: 3.5 to 7.5 mm); 70 to 79 years (n=6), 5.17 mm (range: 4.6 to 6.0 mm); and 80 years (n=4), 4.85 mm (range: 4.1 to 5.3 mm). These values were consistent with studies using infrared photography. The standard deviation was >0.1 mm in 10 (3.8%) participants, all of whom were younger than 55 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The dark-adapted pupil diameter is an important clinical variable when planning refractive surgery. Surgeons can compare a patient's dark-adapted pupil diameter with the results of this population study to identify outlier measurements, which may be erroneous, and repeat testing prior to surgery. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20506961     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20100511-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  10 in total

1.  Relation between time spent outdoors and exfoliation glaucoma or exfoliation glaucoma suspect.

Authors:  Jae H Kang; Janey L Wiggs; Louis R Pasquale
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Pupillometry measures of autonomic nervous system regulation with advancing age in a healthy pediatric cohort.

Authors:  Molly Winston; Amy Zhou; Casey M Rand; Emma C Dunne; Justin J Warner; Lena J Volpe; Brooke A Pigneri; Drew Simon; Thomas Bielawiec; Samantha C Gordon; Sally F Vitez; Aaron Charnay; Stephen Joza; Kristen Kelly; Cia Panicker; Saajidha Rizvydeen; Grace Niewijk; Cara Coleman; Bradley J Scher; David W Reed; Sara M Hockney; Gigi Buniao; Tracey Stewart; Lynne Trojanowski; Cindy Brogadir; Michelle Price; Anna S Kenny; Allison Bradley; Nicholas J Volpe; Debra E Weese-Mayer
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.435

3.  Suitability of open-field autorefractors as pupillometers and instrument design effects.

Authors:  Carles Otero; Mikel Aldaba; Oriol Ferrer; Andrea Gascón; Juan C Ondategui-Parra; Jaume Pujol
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Construction of an inexpensive, hand-held fundus camera through modification of a consumer "point-and-shoot" camera.

Authors:  Kenneth Tran; Thomas A Mendel; Kristina L Holbrook; Paul A Yates
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Solar exposure and residential geographic history in relation to exfoliation syndrome in the United States and Israel.

Authors:  Louis R Pasquale; Aliya Z Jiwani; Tzukit Zehavi-Dorin; Arow Majd; Douglas J Rhee; Teresa Chen; Angela Turalba; Lucy Shen; Stacey Brauner; Cynthia Grosskreutz; Matthew Gardiner; Sherleen Chen; Sheila Borboli-Gerogiannis; Scott H Greenstein; Kenneth Chang; Robert Ritch; Stephanie Loomis; Jae H Kang; Janey L Wiggs; Hani Levkovitch-Verbin
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  Characterization of Dysfunctional Lens Index and Opacity Grade in a Healthy Population.

Authors:  Elena Martínez-Plaza; Pedro Ruiz-Fortes; Roberto Soto-Negro; Carlos J Hernández-Rodríguez; Ainhoa Molina-Martín; Alfonso Arias-Puente; David P Piñero
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07

Review 7.  Exfoliation Syndrome and Solar Exposure: New Epidemiological Insights Into the Pathophysiology of the Disease.

Authors:  Aliya Z Jiwani; Louis R Pasquale
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2015

8.  Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell function in relation to age: a pupillometric study in humans with special reference to the age-related optic properties of the lens.

Authors:  Kristina Herbst; Birgit Sander; Henrik Lund-Andersen; Adam Elias Broendsted; Line Kessel; Michael Stormly Hansen; Aki Kawasaki
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Ultraviolet damage to the eye revisited: eye-sun protection factor (E-SPF®), a new ultraviolet protection label for eyewear.

Authors:  Francine Behar-Cohen; Gilles Baillet; Tito de Ayguavives; Paula Ortega Garcia; Jean Krutmann; Pablo Peña-García; Charlotte Reme; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-19

10.  Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell-driven pupil responses in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jakaria Mostafa; Jason Porter; Hope M Queener; Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.