OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a combined indocyanine green-enhanced optical imaging/radiography system for the detection of arthritic joints in a rat model of antigen-induced arthritis. METHODS: Arthritis of the knee and ankle joints was induced in 6 Harlan rats, using peptidoglycan-polysaccharide polymers. Three rats served as untreated controls. Optical imaging of the knee and ankle joints was done with an integrated optical imaging/radiography system before and up to 24 hours following intravenous injection of 10 mg/kg indocyanine green. The fluorescence signal intensities of arthritic and normal joints were compared for significant differences, using generalized estimating equation models. Specimens of knee and ankle joints were further processed and evaluated by histology. RESULTS: Immediately after administration, indocyanine green provided a significant increase in the fluorescence signal of arthritic joints compared with baseline values (P < 0.05). The fluorescence signal of arthritic joints was significantly higher compared with that of nonarthritic control joints at 1-720 minutes after intravenous injection (P < 0.05). Fusion of indocyanine green-enhanced optical imaging and radiography allowed for anatomic coregistration of the inflamed tissue with the associated joint. Hematoxylin and eosin staining confirmed marked synovial inflammation of arthritic joints and the absence of inflammation in control joints. CONCLUSION: Indocyanine green-enhanced optical imaging is a clinically applicable tool for detection of arthritic tissue. Using relatively high doses of indocyanine green, long-term enhanced fluorescence of arthritic joints can be achieved. This may facilitate simultaneous evaluations of multiple joints in a clinical setting. Fusion of indocyanine green-enhanced optical imaging scans with radiography increases anatomic resolution.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a combined indocyanine green-enhanced optical imaging/radiography system for the detection of arthritic joints in a rat model of antigen-induced arthritis. METHODS:Arthritis of the knee and ankle joints was induced in 6 Harlan rats, using peptidoglycan-polysaccharide polymers. Three rats served as untreated controls. Optical imaging of the knee and ankle joints was done with an integrated optical imaging/radiography system before and up to 24 hours following intravenous injection of 10 mg/kg indocyanine green. The fluorescence signal intensities of arthritic and normal joints were compared for significant differences, using generalized estimating equation models. Specimens of knee and ankle joints were further processed and evaluated by histology. RESULTS: Immediately after administration, indocyanine green provided a significant increase in the fluorescence signal of arthritic joints compared with baseline values (P < 0.05). The fluorescence signal of arthritic joints was significantly higher compared with that of nonarthritic control joints at 1-720 minutes after intravenous injection (P < 0.05). Fusion of indocyanine green-enhanced optical imaging and radiography allowed for anatomic coregistration of the inflamed tissue with the associated joint. Hematoxylin and eosin staining confirmed marked synovial inflammation of arthritic joints and the absence of inflammation in control joints. CONCLUSION:Indocyanine green-enhanced optical imaging is a clinically applicable tool for detection of arthritic tissue. Using relatively high doses of indocyanine green, long-term enhanced fluorescence of arthritic joints can be achieved. This may facilitate simultaneous evaluations of multiple joints in a clinical setting. Fusion of indocyanine green-enhanced optical imaging scans with radiography increases anatomic resolution.
Authors: Alexander K Scheel; Andreas Krause; Ingolf Mesecke-Von Rheinbaben; Georg Metzger; Helmut Rost; Volker Tresp; Peter Mayer; Monika Reuss-Borst; Gerhard A Müller Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2002-05
Authors: Marcin Szkudlarek; Mette Klarlund; Eva Narvestad; Michel Court-Payen; Charlotte Strandberg; Karl E Jensen; Henrik S Thomsen; Mikkel Østergaard Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2006-03-06 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Tuula Peñate Medina; Jan Philip Kolb; Gereon Hüttmann; Robert Huber; Oula Peñate Medina; Linh Ha; Patricia Ulloa; Naomi Larsen; Arianna Ferrari; Magdalena Rafecas; Mark Ellrichmann; Mariya S Pravdivtseva; Mariia Anikeeva; Jana Humbert; Marcus Both; Jennifer E Hundt; Jan-Bernd Hövener Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Facundo Las Heras; Ralph S DaCosta; Kenneth P H Pritzker; Nigil Haroon; George Netchev; Hing Wo Tsui; Basil Chiu; W Mark Erwin; Florence W L Tsui; Robert D Inman Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Valentin S Schäfer; Wolfgang Hartung; Patrick Hoffstetter; Jörn Berger; Christian Stroszczynski; Martina Müller; Martin Fleck; Boris Ehrenstein Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2013 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Joani M Christensen; Gabriel A Brat; Kristine E Johnson; Yongping Chen; Kate J Buretta; Damon S Cooney; Gerald Brandacher; W P Andrew Lee; Xingde Li; Justin M Sacks Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 3.240