Literature DB >> 20505568

Reproducibility of rasterstereography for kyphotic and lordotic angles, trunk length, and trunk inclination: a reliability study.

Mohokum Melvin1, Melvin Mohokum, Mendoza Sylvia, Sylvia Mendoza, Wolf Udo, Helmut Sitter, Jürgen R Paletta, Adrian Skwara.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Determination of reliability with 3 investigators using a collective of healthy volunteers.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of rasterstereography 3-dimensional back surface analysis and reconstruction of the spine in healthy test subjects. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rasterstereography has been in clinical use since 1989 for patients with scoliosis and other spinal deformities and it significantly reduces the need for otherwise indispensable radiographs. The validity of this device has previously been examined in other studies. This study was performed to evaluate the reliability of rasterstereography for clinical application in diagnostic and follow-up examinations.
METHODS: Fifty-one healthy volunteers were examined rasterstereographically by 3 investigators. Each investigator made a series of 3 measurements of each participant in which 8 spine parameters including kyphotic angle ICT-ITL (max.), kyphotic angle VP-ITL, kyphotic angle VP-T12, lordotic angle ITL-ILS (max.), lordotic angle ITL-DM, lordotic angle T12-DM, trunk length VP-DM and trunk inclination were measured. Cronbach alpha was calculated. The influence of high or low body mass index on the accuracy of the technique was evaluated as well.
RESULTS: Cronbach alpha for the intratester-reliability of the kyphotic angle ICT-ITL (max.) for the 3 investigators has values between 0.921 and 0.992. The intertester-reliability for the same parameter is 0.979 (95% CI). In this study group a meaningful association between body mass index and reliability of the device was not found.
CONCLUSION: The reliability revealed very good results, both for intratester and for intertester reliability. The technique is well suited for analysis of the back in standing position. The body mass index has no influence on the reproducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20505568     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cbc157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  35 in total

1.  The effect of simulating leg length inequality on spinal posture and pelvic position: a dynamic rasterstereographic analysis.

Authors:  Marcel Betsch; Michael Wild; Birgit Große; Walter Rapp; Thomas Horstmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Authors' reply to the Letter to the Editor of J. Padulo et al. concerning "Video raster stereography back shape reconstruction: a reliability study for sagittal, frontal, and transversal plane parameters" by Schroeder J, Reer R, Braumann KM (2015), Eur Spine J; 24(2):262-269. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3664-5.

Authors:  Jan Schroeder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Can different occlusal positions instantaneously impact spine and body posture? : A pilot study using rasterstereography for a three-dimensional evaluation.

Authors:  Karoline März; Werner Adler; Ragai-Edward Matta; Linda Wolf; Manfred Wichmann; Bastian Bergauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Reply to the letter to the editor of L. Russo et al. concerning "Relationship between sagittal spinal curves geometry and isokinetic trunk muscle strength in adults" by W. Elsayed, A. Farrag, Q. Muaidi, N. Almulhim (2018) Eur Spine J 27:2014-2022.

Authors:  Walaa Hamdy Elsayed; Ahmed Taha Farrag; Qassim Ibrahim Muaidi; Nora Ahmed Almulhim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Spinal posture and pelvic position during pregnancy: a prospective rasterstereographic pilot study.

Authors:  Marcel Betsch; Regina Wehrle; Larissa Dor; Walter Rapp; Pascal Jungbluth; Mohssen Hakimi; Michael Wild
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Formetric rasterstereography: a new perspective. Reply to Padulo and Ardigó.

Authors:  M Krause; M Amling; F Barvencik
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Formetric rasterstereography: a new perspective.

Authors:  J Padulo; L P Ardigò
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Does age affect the response of pelvis and spine to simulated leg length discrepancies? A rasterstereographic pilot study.

Authors:  Michael Wild; Britta Kühlmann; Anna Stauffenberg; Pascal Jungbluth; Mohssen Hakimi; Walter Rapp; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Influence of non-traumatic thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures on sagittal spine alignment assessed by radiation-free spinometry.

Authors:  M Krause; S Breer; B Mohrmann; E Vettorazzi; R P Marshall; M Amling; F Barvencik
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Spinal alignment in low back pain patients and age-related side effects: a multivariate cross-sectional analysis of video rasterstereography back shape reconstruction data.

Authors:  J Schroeder; H Schaar; K Mattes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.