Literature DB >> 20505505

Prognostic impact of regional lymph node micrometastasis in patients with node-negative biliary cancer.

Atsuya Yonemori1, Satoshi Kondo, Yoshihiro Matsuno, Tomoo Ito, Yoshitsugu Nakanishi, Masaki Miyamoto, Eiichi Tanaka, Satoshi Hirano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To immunohistochemically identify regional lymph node micrometastases in patients with regional node-negative biliary cancer who underwent curative resection, and to evaluate their clinical significance. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The clinical significance of immunohistochemically detected lymph node micrometastasis has recently been evaluated in various tumors. However, few reports have focused on this issue with regard to biliary cancer.
METHODS: A total of 1421 regional lymph nodes from 151 patients with biliary cancer with negative regional nodes (as determined by conventional methods) were immunostained with antibody against cytokeratins 7 and 8 (CAM5.2). Prognostic impact was evaluated among patients with no metastasis, micrometastasis, and obvious metastasis detected by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Immunostained tumor foci were classified as small micrometastasis or large micrometastasis according to size (above or below 0.2 mm).
RESULTS: CAM5.2-positive occult carcinoma cells in regional lymph nodes were detected in 33 (22%) of 151 patients and 49 (3%) of 1421 regional lymph nodes. Small micrometastases were detected in 23 patients, whereas large micrometastases were found in 10 patients. Survival for patients with micrometastasis was significantly worse than that for patients without (P = 0.0051), but was significantly better than that for patients with overt metastasis (P = 0.0092). No significant difference in postoperative survival was seen between patients with small and large micrometastases (P = 0.4221).
CONCLUSIONS: Occult cancer cells were present in regional lymph nodes of 22% patients with regional node-negative biliary cancer, and were associated with significantly worse survival. Patients with micrometastases should be treated as carefully as node-positive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20505505     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e33c0a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

1.  Pathology: Does nodal micrometastasis impact outcome in biliary cancer?

Authors:  Michael A Silva; Peter J Friend
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Lymph node micrometastasis in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Swati H Shah; Nikhil Gupta; Gurudutt Gupta; Anurag Mehta; Shivendra Singh
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-07

Review 3.  Management of lymph nodes during resection of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Neda Amini; Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Shishir K Maithel; Yuhree Kim; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Evaluation of extra capsular lymph node involvement in patients with extra-hepatic bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Takehiro Noji; Masaki Miyamoto; Kanako C Kubota; Toshiya Shinohara; Yoshiyasu Ambo; Yoshihiro Matsuno; Nobuichi Kashimura; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Lymph Node Micrometastases are Associated with Worse Survival in Patients with Otherwise Node-Negative Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hendrik T J Mantel; Jim K Wiggers; Joanne Verheij; Jan J Doff; Egbert Sieders; Thomas M van Gulik; Annette S H Gouw; Robert J Porte
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 5.344

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.