Literature DB >> 20505056

Immediate effect and predictors of effectiveness of taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome: a prospective cohort study.

Tsung-Yu Lan1, Wei-Peng Lin, Ching-Chuan Jiang, Hongsen Chiang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Taping has been used to treat patellofemoral pain syndrome for more than 20 years, but its effectiveness is still controversial.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to investigate the effect and predictors of effectiveness of taping in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 118 consecutive patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome were recruited; 100 of them completed this study. Patient sex, age, body mass index, Q angle, lateral patellar displacement, and lateral patellofemoral angle were recorded/measured. One therapist applied adhesive tape to each patient by the McConnell method. Patients scored their pain level on a 100-mm visual analog scale during stepping down from an 8-in platform, before and after taping. The change of score was evaluated by paired t test. Patients with a visual analog scale score decrease of 20 mm or more after taping were considered responsive, and the others were considered nonresponsive. The influences of the aforementioned factors, plus pretaping visual analog scale score, on the effectiveness of taping were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: The overall mean visual analog scale score decreased significantly after taping (from 49.0 to 29.3 mm; P < .001). There were 66 patients in the responsive group and 34 in nonresponsive group. Among the factors, body mass index, lateral patellofemoral angle, and Q angle were significant predictors of effectiveness. The responsive group had significantly smaller mean lateral patellofemoral angle, larger mean Q angle, and larger mean pretaping visual analog scale score than the nonresponsive group.
CONCLUSION: Taping was an effective treatment for patellofemoral pain syndrome, but was less effective in patients with higher body mass index, larger lateral patellofemoral angle, and smaller Q angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20505056     DOI: 10.1177/0363546510364840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  17 in total

1.  CURRENT CONCEPTS AND TREATMENT OF PATELLOFEMORAL COMPRESSIVE ISSUES.

Authors:  Michael J Mullaney; Takumi Fukunaga
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

2.  Linear influence of distal femur osteotomy on the Q-angle: one degree of varization alters the Q-angle by one degree.

Authors:  A Flury; L Jud; A Hoch; R S Camenzind; S F Fucentese
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Assessment of validity and reliability of femoral shaft-patellar tendon angle measured on MRI.

Authors:  Himanshu Gupta; Himanshu Kataria; Nafisa Shakir Batta; Sunil Yadav; Vineet Jain
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  [Therapy of isolated arthritis in the patellofemoral joint: are there evidence-based options?].

Authors:  C Lüring; M Tingart; W Drescher; H R Springorum; C N Kraft; B Rath
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Re-evaluating the functional implications of the Q-angle and its relationship to in-vivo patellofemoral kinematics.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Timothy J Brindle; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Long-term efficacy of a short period of taping followed by an exercise program in a cohort of patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Marco Paoloni; Giancarlo Fratocchi; Massimiliano Mangone; Massimiliano Murgia; Valter Santilli; Angelo Cacchio
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Patellofemoral pain: an update on diagnostic and treatment options.

Authors:  Moira M McCarthy; Sabrina M Strickland
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

8.  A comparison of two taping techniques (kinesio and mcconnell) and their effect on anterior knee pain during functional activities.

Authors:  Marc Campolo; Jenie Babu; Katarzyna Dmochowska; Shiju Scariah; Jincy Varughese
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-04

9.  Clinical effectiveness of kinesiological taping on pain and pain-free shoulder range of motion in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Hassan Shakeri; Roshanak Keshavarz; Amir Massoud Arab; Ismaeil Ebrahimi
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-12

10.  Effectiveness of the kinesiotaping in the patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Ezel Günay; Selda Sarıkaya; Şenay Özdolap; Çağatay Büyükuysal
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.