BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been linked to inflammatory factors and obesity. Epicardial fat is a source of several inflammatory mediators related to the development of coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that periatrial fat may have a similar role in the development of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left atrium (LA) epicardial fat pad thickness was measured in consecutive cardiac CT angiograms performed for coronary artery disease or AF. Patients were grouped by AF burden: no (n=73), paroxysmal (n=60), or persistent (n=36) AF. In a short-axis view at the mid LA, periatrial epicardial fat thickness was measured at the esophagus (LA-ESO), main pulmonary artery, and thoracic aorta; retrosternal fat was measured in axial view (right coronary ostium level). LA area was determined in the 4-chamber view. LA-ESO fat was thicker in patients with persistent AF versus paroxysmal AF (P=0.011) or no AF (P=0.003). LA area was larger in patients with persistent AF than paroxysmal AF (P=0.004) or without AF (P<0.001). LA-ESO was a significant predictor of AF burden even after adjusting for age, body mass index, and LA area (odds ratio, 5.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.39 to 20.24; P=0.015). A propensity score-adjusted multivariable logistic regression that included age, body mass index, LA area, and comorbidities was also performed and the relationship remained statistically significant (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Increased posterior LA fat thickness appears to be associated with AF burden independent of age, body mass index, or LA area. Further studies are necessary to examine cause and effect, and if inflammatory, paracrine mediators explain this association.
BACKGROUND:Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been linked to inflammatory factors and obesity. Epicardial fat is a source of several inflammatory mediators related to the development of coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that periatrial fat may have a similar role in the development of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left atrium (LA) epicardial fat pad thickness was measured in consecutive cardiac CT angiograms performed for coronary artery disease or AF. Patients were grouped by AF burden: no (n=73), paroxysmal (n=60), or persistent (n=36) AF. In a short-axis view at the mid LA, periatrial epicardial fat thickness was measured at the esophagus (LA-ESO), main pulmonary artery, and thoracic aorta; retrosternal fat was measured in axial view (right coronary ostium level). LA area was determined in the 4-chamber view. LA-ESO fat was thicker in patients with persistent AF versus paroxysmal AF (P=0.011) or no AF (P=0.003). LA area was larger in patients with persistent AF than paroxysmal AF (P=0.004) or without AF (P<0.001). LA-ESO was a significant predictor of AF burden even after adjusting for age, body mass index, and LA area (odds ratio, 5.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.39 to 20.24; P=0.015). A propensity score-adjusted multivariable logistic regression that included age, body mass index, LA area, and comorbidities was also performed and the relationship remained statistically significant (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Increased posterior LA fat thickness appears to be associated with AF burden independent of age, body mass index, or LA area. Further studies are necessary to examine cause and effect, and if inflammatory, paracrine mediators explain this association.
Authors: T Morgera; A Di Lenarda; L Dreas; B Pinamonti; F Humar; R Bussani; F Silvestri; D Chersevani; F Camerini Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1992-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Yinong Young-Xu; Samer Jabbour; Robert Goldberg; Charles M Blatt; Thomas Graboys; Brian Bilchik; Shmuel Ravid Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Ronnier J Aviles; David O Martin; Carolyn Apperson-Hansen; Penny L Houghtaling; Pentti Rautaharju; Richard A Kronmal; Russell P Tracy; David R Van Wagoner; Bruce M Psaty; Michael S Lauer; Mina K Chung Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-11-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Tomasz Mazurek; LiFeng Zhang; Andrew Zalewski; John D Mannion; James T Diehl; Hwyda Arafat; Lea Sarov-Blat; Shawn O'Brien; Elizabeth A Keiper; Anthony G Johnson; Jack Martin; Barry J Goldstein; Yi Shi Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rajinder P Singh-Moon; Soo Young Park; Diego M Song Cho; Agastya Vaidya; Charles C Marboe; Elaine Y Wan; Christine P Hendon Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Jadranka Stojanovska; Ella A Kazerooni; Mohamad Sinno; Barry H Gross; Kuanwong Watcharotone; Smita Patel; Jon A Jacobson; Hakan Oral Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Martin Greif; Franz von Ziegler; Reza Wakili; Janine Tittus; Christoph Becker; Susanne Helbig; Ruediger P Laubender; Wolfgang Schwarz; Melvin D'Anastasi; Jan Schenzle; Alexander W Leber; Alexander Becker Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-04-13 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Jeffrey J Goldberger; Rishi Arora; David Green; Philip Greenland; Daniel C Lee; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Michael Markl; Jason Ng; Sanjiv J Shah Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 29.690