Literature DB >> 20503941

Radiographic markers of acetabular retroversion: correlation of the cross-over sign, ischial spine sign and posterior wall sign.

Clément M L Werner1, Carol E Copeland, Thomas Ruckstuhl, Jeff Stromberg, Clifford H Turen, Fabian Kalberer, Patrick O Zingg.   

Abstract

Radiological diagnosis of acetabular retroversion is based on the presence of the cross-over sign (COS), the posterior wall sign (PWS), and prominence of the ischial spine (PRISS). The primary purpose of the study was to correlate the quantitative cross-over sign with the presence or absence of the PRISS and PWS signs. The hypothesis was that both, PRISS and PWS are associated with a higher cross-over sign ratio or higher amount of acetabular retroversion. A previous study identified 1417 patients with a positive acetabular cross-over sign. Among these, three radiological parameters were assessed: (1) the amount of acetabular retroversion, quantified as a cross-over sign ratio; (2) the presence of the PRISS sign; (3) the presence of the PWS sign. The relation of these three parameters was analysed using Fisher's exact test, ANOVA, and linear regression analysis. In hips with cross-over sign, the PRISS was present in 61.7%. A direct association between PRISS and the cross-over sign ratio (p < 0.001) was seen. The PWS was positive in 31% of the hips and was also significantly related with the cross-over sign ratio (p < 0.001). In hips with a PRISS, 39.7% had a PWS sign, which was a significant relation (p < 0.001). In patients with positive PWS, 78.8% of the cases also had a PRISS (p < 0.001). Both the PRISS and PWS signs were significantly associated with higher grade cross-over values. Both the PRISS and PWS signs as well as the coexistence of COS, PRISS, and PWS are significantly associated with higher grade of acetabular retroversion. In conjunction with the COS, the PRISS and PWS signs indicate severe acetabular retroversion. Presence and recognition of distinct radiological signs around the hip joint might raise the awareness of possible femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20503941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  22 in total

1.  New radiographic index for evaluating acetabular version.

Authors:  Hiroshi Koyama; Hironobu Hoshino; Daisuke Suzuki; Shoichi Nishikino; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Coxa profunda: is the deep acetabulum overcovered?

Authors:  Lucas A Anderson; Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  FAI morphology increases the risk for osteoarthritis in young people with a minimum follow-up of 25 years.

Authors:  Armando Hoch; Pascal Schenk; Thorsten Jentzsch; Stefan Rahm; Patrick O Zingg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Significant improvement after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in women.

Authors:  Jesus Mas Martinez; David Bustamante Suarez de Puga; Carmen Verdu-Roman; Enrique Martinez Gimenez; Manuel Morales Santias; Javier Sanz-Reig
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Arthroscopic Treatment of Mild/Borderline Hip Dysplasia with Concomitant Femoroacetabular Impingement-Literature Review.

Authors:  Ran Atzmon; Marc R Safran
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-06-16

6.  Arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement has limited effect in patients with Tönnis grade-2 at 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jesus Mas Martinez; Carmen Verdu-Roman; David Bustamante Suarez de Puga; Manuel Morales Santias; Enrique Martinez Gimenez; Javier Sanz-Reig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Acetabular fracture types vary with different acetabular version.

Authors:  Clément M L Werner; Carol E Copeland; Thomas Ruckstuhl; Jeff Stromberg; Clifford H Turen; Samy Bouaicha
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Diagnostic Value of Ischial Spine Sign in Patients with Acetabular Retroversion.

Authors:  Mohamad Qoreishy; Hamid R S Hosseinzadeh; Ali Keipourfard; Arya Shoghli
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-03

9.  Correlation between radiographic measures of acetabular morphology with 3D femoral head coverage in patients with acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Benjamin J Hansen; Michael D Harris; Lucas A Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Correlation of pelvic incidence with radiographical parameters for acetabular retroversion: a retrospective radiological study.

Authors:  Simon Tiziani; Lucienne Gautier; Jan Farei-Campagna; Georg Osterhoff; Thorsten Jentzsch; Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim; Clément M L Werner
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.