Literature DB >> 20502535

Modeling Dynamic Functional Neuroimaging Data Using Structural Equation Modeling.

Larry R Price1, Angela R Laird, Peter T Fox, Roger J Ingham.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to present a method for developing a path analytic network model using data acquired from positron emission tomography. Regions of interest within the human brain were identified through quantitative activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Using this information, a "true" or population path model was then developed using Bayesian structural equation modeling. To evaluate the impact of sample size on parameter estimation bias, proportion of parameter replication coverage, and statistical power, a 2 group (clinical/control) × 6 (sample size: N = 10, N = 15, N = 20, N = 25, N = 50, N = 100) Markov chain Monte Carlo study was conducted. Results indicate that using a sample size of less than N = 15 per group will produce parameter estimates exhibiting bias greater than 5% and statistical power below .80.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20502535      PMCID: PMC2874985          DOI: 10.1080/10705510802561402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling        ISSN: 1070-5511            Impact factor:   6.125


  34 in total

1.  Location-probability profiles for the mouth region of human primary motor-sensory cortex: model and validation.

Authors:  P T Fox; A Huang; L M Parsons; J H Xiong; F Zamarippa; L Rainey; J L Lancaster
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data?

Authors:  E Bullmore; B Horwitz; G Honey; M Brammer; S Williams; T Sharma
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Can meaningful effective connectivities be obtained between auditory cortical regions?

Authors:  M S Gonçalves; D A Hall; I S Johnsrude; M P Haggard
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Guinevere F Eden; Karen M Jones; Thomas A Zeffiro
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Bayesian model comparison of nonlinear structural equation models with missing continuous and ordinal categorical data.

Authors:  Sik-Yum Lee; Xin-Yuan Song
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Interindividual differences in functional interactions among prefrontal, parietal and parahippocampal regions during working memory.

Authors:  Michael F Glabus; Barry Horwitz; John L Holt; Philip D Kohn; Brooke K Gerton; Joseph H Callicott; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Karen Faith Berman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Modulation of effective connectivity inside the working memory network in patients at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M V Au Duong; K Boulanouar; B Audoin; S Treseras; D Ibarrola; I Malikova; S Confort-Gouny; P Celsis; J Pelletier; P J Cozzone; J P Ranjeva
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Connectivity exploration with structural equation modeling: an fMRI study of bimanual motor coordination.

Authors:  Jiancheng Zhuang; Stephen LaConte; Scott Peltier; Kan Zhang; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Cooperation of the anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for attention shifting.

Authors:  Hirohito Kondo; Naoyuki Osaka; Mariko Osaka
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Effects of verbal working memory load on corticocortical connectivity modeled by path analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  G D Honey; C H Y Fu; J Kim; M J Brammer; T J Croudace; J Suckling; E M Pich; S C R Williams; E T Bullmore
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Distributed processing; distributed functions?

Authors:  Peter T Fox; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Modeling the effective connectivity of the visual network in healthy and photosensitive, epileptic baboons.

Authors:  C Ákos Szabó; Felipe S Salinas; Karl Li; Crystal Franklin; M Michelle Leland; Peter T Fox; Angela R Laird; Shalini Narayana
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain: Power and Sample Size Considerations.

Authors:  Georgios Sideridis; Panagiotis Simos; Andrew Papanicolaou; Jack Fletcher
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Vector autoregression, structural equation modeling, and their synthesis in neuroimaging data analysis.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Daniel R Glen; Ziad S Saad; J Paul Hamilton; Moriah E Thomason; Ian H Gotlib; Robert W Cox
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Meta-analysis in human neuroimaging: computational modeling of large-scale databases.

Authors:  Peter T Fox; Jack L Lancaster; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Enhanced inter-regional coupling of neural responses and repetition suppression provide separate contributions to long-term behavioral priming.

Authors:  Stephen J Gotts; Shawn C Milleville; Alex Martin
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-04-20

7.  Effective connectivity underlying neural and behavioral components of prism adaptation.

Authors:  Selene Schintu; Stephen J Gotts; Michael Freedberg; Sarah Shomstein; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02

8.  Progressive Bidirectional Age-Related Changes in Default Mode Network Effective Connectivity across Six Decades.

Authors:  Karl Li; Angela R Laird; Larry R Price; D Reese McKay; John Blangero; David C Glahn; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.750

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.