Literature DB >> 20501713

Calcifications in digital mammographic screening: improvement of early detection of invasive breast cancers?

Stefanie Weigel1, Thomas Decker, Eberhard Korsching, Daniela Hungermann, Werner Böcker, Walter Heindel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relevance of calcifications for invasive breast cancer detection in population-based digital mammographic screening.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by an independent ethics committee, and no additional informed consent was required. Prospectively documented radiologic cancer features were correlated with pathologic characteristics in 241 breast malignancies diagnosed in 24067 participating women aged 50-69 years (part of the digital German Screening Program; initial screening rate, 92%; detection rate [DR], 1.0%; recall rate [RR], 7.5%). The rates of invasive cancers detected on the basis of calcifications were analyzed against pathologic tumor categories (pT categories) and histologic grades. For comparison of the study data with results of analog screening, data from the literature regarding calcification-specific RR, DR, and positive predictive value for recall (PPV(1)) were calculated.
RESULTS: The calcification-specific RR was 1.7% (416 of 24067). The calcification-specific DR for invasive cancer was 0.12% (29 of 24067), and the PPV(1) was 7.0% (29 of 416). Of all malignancies detected on the basis of calcification, 38% (29 of 77) were invasive. pT1 cancers showed an inverse association between tumor size and rate of detection on the basis of calcification; differences in rates among pT1 subcategories were statistically significant (P < .001). The proportion of grade 1 pT1 cancers detected on the basis of calcification (eight of 27) did not differ significantly from that of cancers detected on the basis of other radiologic features (46 of 108, P = .24). The calcification-specific invasive cancer DR was significantly higher for digital than for analog mammography.
CONCLUSION: One-third of malignancies detected on the basis of calcifications only are invasive cancers. They tend to be smaller but not less aggressive than invasive cancers detected on the basis of other features. Compared with published results of analog screening, digital screening offers the potential to increase the rate of invasive cancers detected on the basis of calcifications in population-based mammographic screening. Copyright RSNA, 2010

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20501713     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  14 in total

1.  Mammography Screening: Evidence, History and Current Practice in Germany and Other European Countries.

Authors:  Cornelis Biesheuvel; Stefanie Weigel; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Differences in radiological patterns, tumour characteristics and diagnostic precision between digital mammography and screen-film mammography in four breast cancer screening programmes in Spain.

Authors:  Laia Domingo; Anabel Romero; Francesc Belvis; Mar Sánchez; Joana Ferrer; Dolores Salas; Josefa Ibáñez; Alfonso Vega; Francesc Ferrer; M Soledad Laso; Francesc Macià; Xavier Castells; Maria Sala
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Microcalcification on mammography: approaches to interpretation and biopsy.

Authors:  Louise Wilkinson; Val Thomas; Nisha Sharma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for microcalcifications and margins to microcalcifications in breast specimens.

Authors:  Claudia Neubauer; Jannina Samantha Yilmaz; Peter Bronsert; Martin Pichotka; Fabian Bamberg; Marisa Windfuhr-Blum; Thalia Erbes; Jakob Neubauer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Cancelled stereotactic biopsy of calcifications not seen using the stereotactic technique: do we still need to biopsy?

Authors:  Sandra B Brennan; Donna D'Alessio; Laura Liberman; Dilip Giri; Edi Brogi; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Calcifications at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Imaging Features and Biopsy Techniques.

Authors:  Joao V Horvat; Delia M Keating; Halio Rodrigues-Duarte; Elizabeth A Morris; Victoria L Mango
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Mammographic features of calcifications in DCIS: correlation with oestrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status.

Authors:  Min Sun Bae; Woo Kyung Moon; Jung Min Chang; Nariya Cho; So Yeon Park; Jae-Kyung Won; Yoon-Kyung Jeon; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Wonshik Han; In Ae Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A Micro CT Study in Patients with Breast Microcalcifications Using a Mathematical Algorithm to Assess 3D Structure.

Authors:  David Kenkel; Zsuzsanna Varga; Heike Heuer; Konstantin J Dedes; Nicole Berger; Lukas Filli; Andreas Boss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Gene expression profiling of calcifications in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sung Ui Shin; Jeonghoon Lee; Ju Han Kim; Won Hwa Kim; Sung Eun Song; Ajung Chu; Hoe Suk Kim; Wonshik Han; Han Suk Ryu; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  A review on methods for diagnosis of breast cancer cells and tissues.

Authors:  Ziyu He; Zhu Chen; Miduo Tan; Sauli Elingarami; Yuan Liu; Taotao Li; Yan Deng; Nongyue He; Song Li; Juan Fu; Wen Li
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.831

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.