Literature DB >> 20500926

Nutritional programming of gastrointestinal tract development. Is the pig a good model for man?

Paul Guilloteau1, Romuald Zabielski, Harald M Hammon, Cornelia C Metges.   

Abstract

The consequences of early-life nutritional programming in man and other mammalian species have been studied chiefly at the metabolic level. Very few studies, if any, have been performed in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) as the target organ, but extensive GIT studies are needed since the GIT plays a key role in nutrient supply and has an impact on functions of the entire organism. The possible deleterious effects of nutritional programming at the metabolic level were discovered following epidemiological studies in human subjects, and confirmed in animal models. Investigating the impact of programming on GIT structure and function would need appropriate animal models due to ethical restrictions in the use of human subjects. The aim of the present review is to discuss the use of pigs as an animal model as a compromise between ethically acceptable animal studies and the requirement of data which can be interpolated to the human situation. In nutritional programming studies, rodents are the most frequently used model for man, but GIT development and digestive function in rodents are considerably different from those in man. In that aspect, the pig GIT is much closer to the human than that of rodents. The swine species is closely comparable with man in many nutritional and digestive aspects, and thus provides ample opportunity to be used in investigations on the consequences of nutritional programming for the GIT. In particular, the 'sow-piglets' dyad could be a useful tool to simulate the 'human mother-infant' dyad in studies which examine short-, middle- and long-term effects and is suggested as the reference model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20500926     DOI: 10.1017/S0954422410000077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Res Rev        ISSN: 0954-4224            Impact factor:   7.800


  77 in total

Review 1.  Comparative digestive physiology.

Authors:  William H Karasov; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 9.090

2.  Methylating micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy influences foetal hepatic gene expression and IGF signalling and increases foetal weight.

Authors:  M Oster; W Nuchchanart; N Trakooljul; E Muráni; A Zeyner; E Wirthgen; A Hoeflich; S Ponsuksili; K Wimmers
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Addition of arabinoxylan and mixed linkage glucans in porcine diets affects the large intestinal bacterial populations.

Authors:  John B Gorham; Seungha Kang; Barbara A Williams; Lucas J Grant; Christopher S McSweeney; Michael J Gidley; Deirdre Mikkelsen
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Microbial composition and in vitro fermentation patterns of human milk oligosaccharides and prebiotics differ between formula-fed and sow-reared piglets.

Authors:  Min Li; Laura L Bauer; Xin Chen; Mei Wang; Theresa B Kuhlenschmidt; Mark S Kuhlenschmidt; George C Fahey; Sharon M Donovan
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Candidate chemosensory cells in the porcine stomach.

Authors:  Patricia Widmayer; Heinz Breer; Nicole Hass
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 4.304

6.  Dissecting the role of milk components on gut microbiota composition.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Maga; Bart C Weimer; James D Murray
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2012-12-12

7.  Characterization of porcine milk oligosaccharides during early lactation and their relation to the fecal microbiome.

Authors:  J Salcedo; S A Frese; D A Mills; D Barile
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Consumption of transgenic cows' milk containing human lactoferrin results in beneficial changes in the gastrointestinal tract and systemic health of young pigs.

Authors:  Caitlin A Cooper; Kathryn M Nelson; Elizabeth A Maga; James D Murray
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Early life adversity in piglets induces long-term upregulation of the enteric cholinergic nervous system and heightened, sex-specific secretomotor neuron responses.

Authors:  J E Medland; C S Pohl; L L Edwards; S Frandsen; K Bagley; Y Li; A J Moeser
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  A Janus Mucoadhesive and Omniphobic Device for Gastrointestinal Retention.

Authors:  Young-Ah Lucy Lee; Shiyi Zhang; Jiaqi Lin; Robert Langer; Giovanni Traverso
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 9.933

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.