Literature DB >> 2050048

Carcinogen adducts as an indicator for the public health risks of consuming carcinogen-exposed fish and shellfish.

B P Dunn1.   

Abstract

A large variety of environmental carcinogens are metabolically activated to electrophilic metabolites that can bind to nucleic acids and protein, forming covalent adducts. The formation of DNA-carcinogen adducts is thought to be a necessary step in the action of most carcinogens. Recently, a variety of new fluorescence, immunochemical, and radioactive-postlabeling procedures have been developed that allow the sensitive measurement of DNA-carcinogen adducts in organisms exposed to environmental carcinogens. In some cases, similar procedures have been developed for protein-carcinogen adducts. In an organism with active metabolic systems for a given carcinogen, adducts are generally much longer lived than the carcinogens that formed them. Thus, the detection of DNA- or protein-carcinogen adducts in aquatic foodstuffs can act as an indicator of prior carcinogen exposure. The presence of DNA adducts would, in addition, suggest a mutagenic/carcinogenic risk to the aquatic organism itself. Vertebrate fish are characterized by high levels of carcinogen metabolism, low body burdens of carcinogen, the formation of carcinogen-macromolecule adducts, and the occurrence of pollution-related tumors. Shellfish, on the other hand, have low levels of carcinogen metabolism, high body burdens of carcinogen, and have little or no evidence of carcinogen-macromolecule adducts or tumors. The consumption of carcinogen adducts in aquatic foodstuffs is unlikely to represent a human health hazard. There are no metabolic pathways by which protein-carcinogen or DNA-carcinogen adducts could reform carcinogens. Incorporation via salvage pathways of preformed nucleoside-carcinogen adducts from foodstuffs into newly synthesized human DNA is theoretically possible.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2050048      PMCID: PMC1519488          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.90-1519488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  25 in total

1.  Kinetics of formation and disappearance of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene:DNA adducts in mouse epidermis.

Authors:  J DiGiovanni; E P Fisher; T W Sawyer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (polynuclears) in foods.

Authors:  M T Lo; E Sandi
Journal:  Residue Rev       Date:  1978

Review 3.  Do carcinogen-modified deoxynucleotide precursors contribute to cellular mutagenesis?

Authors:  E T Snow; S Mitra
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Covalent binding of benzo[a]pyrene to dna in fish liver.

Authors:  U Varanasi; J E Stein; T Hom
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1981-11-30       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Topical treatment of mice with benzo[a]pyrene or parenteral administration of benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-DNA to rats results in faecal excretion of a putative benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-deoxyguanosine adduct.

Authors:  B Tierney; C N Martin; R C Garner
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Molecular cancer epidemiology: a new tool in cancer prevention.

Authors:  F P Perera
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Comparative metabolism of benzo(a)pyrene and covalent binding to hepatic DNA in English sole, starry flounder, and rat.

Authors:  U Varanasi; M Nishimoto; W L Reichert; B T Le Eberhart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  32P-postlabeling analysis of DNA adducts persisting for up to 42 weeks in the skin, epidermis and dermis of mice treated topically with 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene.

Authors:  E Randerath; H P Agrawal; J A Weaver; C B Bordelon; K Randerath
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 9.  Chemical carcinogenesis in feral fish: uptake, activation, and detoxication of organic xenobiotics.

Authors:  U Varanasi; J E Stein; M Nishimoto; W L Reichert; T K Collier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Field and laboratory studies of the etiology of liver neoplasms in marine fish from Puget Sound.

Authors:  D C Malins; B B McCain; M S Myers; D W Brown; M M Krahn; W T Roubal; M H Schiewe; J T Landahl; S L Chan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

1.  In situ biomonitoring of caged, juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Lower Duwamish Waterway.

Authors:  Matthew A Kelley; Annika Gillespie; Guo-Dong Zhou; Shu Zhang; James P Meador; Bruce Duncan; Kirby C Donnelly; Thomas J McDonald
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Molecular dosimetry of DNA adducts in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to benzo(a)pyrene by different routes.

Authors:  D Potter; T M Clarius; A S Wright; W P Watson
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 3.  Aquatic toxicology: past, present, and prospects.

Authors:  J B Pritchard
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Carcinogenesis studies in rodents for evaluating risks associated with chemical carcinogens in aquatic food animals.

Authors:  J Huff; J Bucher; R Yang
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Outdoor air pollution and cancer: An overview of the current evidence and public health recommendations.

Authors:  Michelle C Turner; Zorana J Andersen; Andrea Baccarelli; W Ryan Diver; Susan M Gapstur; C Arden Pope; Diddier Prada; Jonathan Samet; George Thurston; Aaron Cohen
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 508.702

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.