BACKGROUND: Clonal evolution is frequently detected in patients developing resistance to imatinib. The outcome of patients with clonal evolution treated with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors is not known. METHODS: The authors analyzed the outcome of 177 CML patients after second tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were in chronic phase, 30 had clonal evolution, 28 were in accelerated phase (AP), and 24 were in AP plus clonal evolution. Major cytogenetic response rates were 58%, 54%, 28%, and 13%; 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 86%, 73%, 68%, and 33%; and 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rates were 69%, 67%, 31%, and 8%, respectively. The hematologic and cytogenetic response rates, OS, and EFS were no different between patients in chronic phase with clonal evolution and patients with chronic phase and no clonal evolution. However, clonal evolution had a significant adverse impact when associated with other features of AP. On multivariate analysis, clonal evolution had no independently significant effect on achieving major cytogenetic response on the second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The factors predicting increasing major cytogenetic response to second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors were prior achievement of major cytogenetic response with imatinib, higher hemoglobin levels, no splenomegaly, lower percentage of Philadelphia chromosome-positive metaphases, and no prior chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Clonal evolution constitutes a heterogeneous entity with variable outcome with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with trisomy 8, chromosome 17, and complex abnormalities having the worst outcome, regardless of the number of metaphases involved. The molecular events behind these abnormalities and potential therapeutic approaches directed at them need to be defined. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Clonal evolution is frequently detected in patients developing resistance to imatinib. The outcome of patients with clonal evolution treated with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors is not known. METHODS: The authors analyzed the outcome of 177 CML patients after second tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were in chronic phase, 30 had clonal evolution, 28 were in accelerated phase (AP), and 24 were in AP plus clonal evolution. Major cytogenetic response rates were 58%, 54%, 28%, and 13%; 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 86%, 73%, 68%, and 33%; and 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rates were 69%, 67%, 31%, and 8%, respectively. The hematologic and cytogenetic response rates, OS, and EFS were no different between patients in chronic phase with clonal evolution and patients with chronic phase and no clonal evolution. However, clonal evolution had a significant adverse impact when associated with other features of AP. On multivariate analysis, clonal evolution had no independently significant effect on achieving major cytogenetic response on the second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The factors predicting increasing major cytogenetic response to second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors were prior achievement of major cytogenetic response with imatinib, higher hemoglobin levels, no splenomegaly, lower percentage of Philadelphia chromosome-positive metaphases, and no prior chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Clonal evolution constitutes a heterogeneous entity with variable outcome with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with trisomy 8, chromosome 17, and complex abnormalities having the worst outcome, regardless of the number of metaphases involved. The molecular events behind these abnormalities and potential therapeutic approaches directed at them need to be defined. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.
Authors: R A Clift; C D Buckner; E D Thomas; E Bryant; C Anasetti; W I Bensinger; R Bowden; H J Deeg; K C Doney; L D Fisher Journal: Blood Date: 1994-12-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: J E Sokal; G A Gomez; M Baccarani; S Tura; B D Clarkson; F Cervantes; C Rozman; F Carbonell; B Anger; H Heimpel Journal: Blood Date: 1988-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jorge Cortes; Moshe Talpaz; Susan O'Brien; Dan Jones; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Jenny Shan; Francis Giles; Stefan Faderl; Srdan Verstovsek; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Mary B Rios; Hagop Kantarjian Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: H M Kantarjian; M J Keating; E H Estey; S O'Brien; S Pierce; M Beran; C Koller; E Feldman; M Talpaz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Francois Guilhot; Jane Apperley; Dong-Wook Kim; Eduardo O Bullorsky; Michele Baccarani; Gail J Roboz; Sergio Amadori; Carmino A de Souza; Jeffrey H Lipton; Andreas Hochhaus; Dominik Heim; Richard A Larson; Susan Branford; Martin C Muller; Prasheen Agarwal; Ashwin Gollerkeri; Moshe Talpaz Journal: Blood Date: 2007-01-30 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Alice Fabarius; Claudia Haferlach; Martin C Müller; Philipp Erben; Tanja Lahaye; Michelle Giehl; Oliver Frank; Wolfgang Seifarth; Rüdiger Hehlmann; Andreas Hochhaus Journal: Haematologica Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: J Cortes; M Talpaz; S O'Brien; M B Rios; A Majlis; M Keating; E J Freireich; H Kantarjian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sarah Marktel; David Marin; Nicola Foot; Richard Szydlo; Marco Bua; Anastasios Karadimitris; Valeria A S De Melo; Paul Kotzampaltiris; Francesco Dazzi; Amin Rahemtulla; Eduardo Olavarria; Jane F Apperley; John M Goldman Journal: Haematologica Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: W Wang; J E Cortes; P Lin; J D Khoury; D Ai; Z Tang; G Tang; J L Jorgensen; L J Medeiros; S Hu Journal: Leukemia Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Kendra Sweet; Najla H Al Ali; Samir M Dalia; Rami S Komrokji; Robert M Crescentini; Sara Tinsley; Jeffrey E Lancet; Peter R Papenhausen; Ling Zhang; Javier Pinilla-Ibarz Journal: Int J Hematol Date: 2014-10-04 Impact factor: 2.490
Authors: Wei Wang; Jorge E Cortes; Pei Lin; Michael W Beaty; Di Ai; Hesham M Amin; Timothy J McDonnell; Chi Young Ok; Hagop M Kantarjian; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Shimin Hu Journal: Blood Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Wei Wang; Jorge E Cortes; Guilin Tang; Joseph D Khoury; Sa Wang; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos; Joseph A DiGiuseppe; Zi Chen; Hagop M Kantarjian; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Shimin Hu Journal: Blood Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 22.113