Literature DB >> 20499352

The FRAX tool in French women: How well does it describe the real incidence of fracture in the OFELY cohort?

Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu1, Françoise Munoz, Pierre D Delmas, Roland D Chapurlat.   

Abstract

The FRAX tool estimates an individual's fracture probability over 10 years from clinical risk factors with or without bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. The aim of our study was to compare the predicted fracture probabilities and the observed incidence of fracture in French women during a 10-year follow-up. The probabilities of fracture at four major sites (hip, clinical spine, shoulder, or wrist) and at the hip were calculated with the FRAX tool in 867 women aged 40 years and over from the Os des Femmes de Lyon (OFELY) cohort.The incidence of fracture was observed over 10 years. Thus 82 women sustained 95 incident major osteoporotic (OP) fractures including 17 fractures at the hip. In women aged at least 65 years (n = 229), the 10-year predicted probabilities of fracture with BMD were 13% for major OP fractures and 5% for hip fractures, contrasting with 3.6% and 0.5% in women younger than 65 years (p < .0001). The predicted probabilities of both major OP and hip fractures were significantly higher in women with osteoporosis (n = 77, 18% and 10%) and osteopenia (n = 390, 6% and 2%) compared with women with normal BMD (n = 208, 3% and <1%; p < .0001. The predicted probabilities of fracture were two and five times higher in women who sustained an incident major OP fracture and a hip fracture compared with women who did not (p < .0001). Nevertheless, among women aged at least 65 years with low BMD values (T-score < or = -1; n = 199), the 10-year predicted probability of major OP fracture with BMD was 48% lower than the observed incidence of fractures (p < .01). A 10-year probability of major OP fracture higher than 12% identified more women with incident fractures than did BMD in the osteoporotic range (p < .05). In French women from the OFELY cohort, the observed incidence of fragility fractures over 10 years increased with age following a pattern similar to the predicted probabilities given by the FRAX tool. However, in women aged at least 65 years with low BMD, the observed incidence of fractures was substantially higher than the predicted probability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20499352     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  30 in total

1.  One-leg standing time and hip-fracture prediction.

Authors:  H Lundin; M Sääf; L-E Strender; S Nyren; S-E Johansson; H Salminen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Validation of FRC, a fracture risk assessment tool, in a cohort of older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.

Authors:  Bruce Ettinger; Hau Liu; Terri Blackwell; Andrew R Hoffman; Kristine E Ensrud; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 3.  Pitfalls in the external validation of FRAX.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Comparison between various fracture risk assessment tools.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Underestimated fracture probability in patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis as calculated by FRAX.

Authors:  Nithya Setty; Meryl S Leboff; Thomas S Thornhill; Giulia Rinaldi; Julie Glowacki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 6.  Low-trauma fractures without osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Lespessailles; B Cortet; E Legrand; P Guggenbuhl; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Trabecular bone score improves fracture risk prediction in non-osteoporotic women: the OFELY study.

Authors:  S Boutroy; D Hans; E Sornay-Rendu; N Vilayphiou; R Winzenrieth; R Chapurlat
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Failure in the application of fragility fracture prevention guidelines.

Authors:  M H Elvey; H Pugh; G Schaller; G Dhotar; B Patel; M J Oddy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 10.  Performance of risk assessment instruments for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Nayak; D L Edwards; A A Saleh; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.