Literature DB >> 20499279

Assessment of left ventricular myocardial scar in infiltrative and non-ischemic cardiac diseases by free breathing three dimensional phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) TurboFLASH.

Aya Kino1, Aoife N Keeling, Cormac T Farrelly, John J Sheehan, Amir H Davarpanah, Peter J Weele, Sven Zuehldorff, James C Carr.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare a navigator gated free breathing 3D Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery (PSIR) TurboFLASH to an established 2D PSIR TurboFLASH method for detecting myocardial late gadolinium hyperenhanced lesions caused by infiltrative and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Under an IRB approved protocol; patients with suspected non-ischemic infiltrative myocardial heart disease were examined on a 1.5T MR scanner for late enhancement after the administration of gadolinium using a segmented 2D PSIR TurboFLASH sequence followed by a navigator-gated 3D PSIR TurboFLASH sequence. Two independent readers analyzed image quality using a four point Likert scale for qualitative analysis (0 = poor, non diagnostic; 1 = fair, diagnostic may be impaired; 2 = good, some artifacts but not interfering in diagnostics, 3 = excellent, no artifacts) and also reported presence or absence of scar. Detected scars were classified based on area and location and also compared quantitatively in volume. Twenty-seven patients were scanned using both protocols. Image quality score did not differ significantly (p = 0.358, Wilcoxon signed rank test) for both technique. Scars were detected in 24 patients. Larger numbers of hyperenhanced scars were detected with 3D PSIR (200) compared to 2D PSIR (167) and scar volume were significant larger in 3D PSIR (p = 0.004). The mean scar volume over all cases was 49.95 cm(3) for 2D PSIR and 70.02 cm(3) for 3D PSIR. The navigator gated free breathing 3D PSIR approach is a suitable method for detecting myocardial late gadolinium hyperenhanced lesions caused by non-ischemic cardiomyopathy due to its complete isotropic coverage of the left ventricle, improving detection of scar lesions compared to 2D PSIR imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20499279     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9640-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  25 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters.

Authors:  Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Comparison of different quantification methods of late gadolinium enhancement in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Mateusz Spiewak; Lukasz A Malek; Jolanta Misko; Lidia Chojnowska; Barbara Milosz; Mariusz Klopotowski; Joanna Petryka; Maciej Dabrowski; Cezary Kepka; Witold Ruzyllo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Andrew E Arai; Elliot R McVeigh; Anthony H Aletras
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Cardiac and neurologic dysfunction in sarcoidosis.

Authors:  O P Sharma
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.878

6.  Effects of time, dose, and inversion time for acute myocardial infarct size measurements based on magnetic resonance imaging-delayed contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Anja Wagner; Heiko Mahrholdt; Louise Thomson; Stefan Hager; Gabriel Meinhardt; Wolfgang Rehwald; Michele Parker; Dipan Shah; Udo Sechtem; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis.

Authors:  Alicia Maria Maceira; Jayshree Joshi; Sanjay Kumar Prasad; James Charles Moon; Enrica Perugini; Idris Harding; Mary Noelle Sheppard; Philip Alexander Poole-Wilson; Philip Nigel Hawkins; Dudley John Pennell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-01-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Assessment of myocardial viability by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Steven G Lloyd; Himanshu Gupta
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.724

9.  Mechanism of late gadolinium enhancement in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Christoph Klein; Thaiz R Schmal; Stephan G Nekolla; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Eckart Fleck; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the European Society Of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases.

Authors:  Perry Elliott; Bert Andersson; Eloisa Arbustini; Zofia Bilinska; Franco Cecchi; Philippe Charron; Olivier Dubourg; Uwe Kühl; Bernhard Maisch; William J McKenna; Lorenzo Monserrat; Sabine Pankuweit; Claudio Rapezzi; Petar Seferovic; Luigi Tavazzi; Andre Keren
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  6 in total

1.  Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac imaging on a 3T scanner with parallel RF transmission technique: prospective comparison of 3D-PSIR and 3D-IR.

Authors:  Anthony Schultz; Thibault Caspar; Mickaël Schaeffer; Aïssam Labani; Mi-Young Jeung; Soraya El Ghannudi; Catherine Roy; Mickaël Ohana
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Improved border sharpness of post-infarct scar by a novel self-navigated free-breathing high-resolution 3D whole-heart inversion recovery magnetic resonance approach.

Authors:  Tobias Rutz; Davide Piccini; Simone Coppo; Jerome Chaptinel; Giulia Ginami; Gabriella Vincenti; Matthias Stuber; Juerg Schwitter
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Ricardo A Costa; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Improved visualisation of hepatic metastases in gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI: Potential of contrast-optimised (phase-sensitive) inversion recovery imaging.

Authors:  Ute Lina Fahlenkamp; Günther Engel; Lisa Christine Adams; Sarah Maria Böker; Minh Huynh Anh; Moritz Wagner; Bernd Hamm; Marcus Richard Makowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Three-dimensional phase-sensitive inversion-recovery Turbo FLASH sequence for the assessment of left ventricular myocardial scar in swine.

Authors:  Xiuyu Chen; Minjie Lu; Gang Yin; Tao Zhao; Xiaoning Shao; Ranxu Zhao; Yue Tang; Jing An; Shiliang Jiang; Shihua Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Simultaneous bright- and black-blood whole-heart MRI for noncontrast enhanced coronary lumen and thrombus visualization.

Authors:  Giulia Ginami; Radhouene Neji; Alkystis Phinikaridou; John Whitaker; René M Botnar; Claudia Prieto
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.668

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.