Literature DB >> 20498562

Ultrasound of the extrahepatic bile duct: issues of size.

Mindy M Horrow1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound is a pivotal study for evaluation of the biliary tree. In particular, the size of the extrahepatic bile duct is a critical measurement and has been a contentious issue since the early days of diagnostic ultrasound. This article reviews the history and ongoing issues regarding sonography of the normal-size duct and a variety of factors that may affect its size, including age, prior surgery, congenital abnormalities, anatomical variations, and medications. Other related sonographic issues are discussed including abnormal nondilated ducts and abnormal intraluminal contents such as sludge or air that make evaluation of the duct more difficult, particularly in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and prior liver transplantation. Ultimately, the luminal size of the extrahepatic duct should be considered as a single part of the entire assessment of the biliary tree that must also include the intrahepatic and pancreatic ducts, the pattern of dilatation (variable vs progressively dilated to a single point of obstruction), any wall thickening, intraluminal sludge, calculi or mass, and extraluminal compression. Clinical symptoms and abnormal laboratory values should prompt further evaluation despite a normal appearance of the bile duct, whereas pursuit of an isolated finding of an enlarged duct without supporting clinical data may not be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20498562     DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3181e17516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Q        ISSN: 0894-8771            Impact factor:   1.657


  8 in total

1.  Clinical significance and long-term outcome of incidentally found bile duct dilatation.

Authors:  Jaryong Jeon; Song Yi Song; Kyu Taek Lee; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Mun Hee Bae; Jong Kyun Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound in common bile duct dilatation with normal liver enzymes.

Authors:  Claudio De Angelis; Milena Marietti; Mauro Bruno; Rinaldo Pellicano; Mario Rizzetto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

3.  Comparison of acute cholangitis with or without common bile duct dilatation.

Authors:  Minoru Tomizawa; Fuminobu Shinozaki; Rumiko Hasegawa; Yoshinori Shirai; Yasufumi Motoyoshi; Takao Sugiyama; Shigenori Yamamoto; Naoki Ishige
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Utilizing CT to identify clinically significant biliary dilatation in symptomatic post-cholecystectomy patients: when should we be worried?

Authors:  Imo I Uko; Cecil Wood; Edward Nguyen; Annie Huang; Roberta Catania; Amir A Borhani; Jeanne M Horowitz; Helena Gabriel; Rajesh Keswani; Paul Nikolaidis; Frank H Miller; Linda C Kelahan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-09-15

5.  Combining endoscopic ultrasound and tumor markers improves the diagnostic yield on the etiology of common bile duct dilation secondary to periampullary pathologies.

Authors:  Han Ding; Pinghong Zhou; Meidong Xu; Weifeng Chen; Quanlin Li; Tao Chen; Mingyan Cai; Tianyin Chen; Jingjing Lian; Yiqun Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

6.  Role of endoscopic biliary drainage in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with jaundice.

Authors:  Hyun Young Woo; Sung Yong Han; Jeong Heo; Dong Uk Kim; Dong Hoon Baek; So Yong Yoo; Chang Won Kim; Suk Kim; Geun Am Song; Mong Cho; Dae Hwan Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predictors of abnormalities on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: is there a role when the biliary tree is normal on previous imaging?

Authors:  Bhamini Vadhwana; John Graby; Martin Lewis; Anouchka Goldman; Antoni Sergot; Catherine Ramsey; Kevin J Monahan
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-15

8.  Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort-Derived Normative Ranges.

Authors:  Marc H Goldfinger; Gerard R Ridgway; Carlos Ferreira; Caitlin R Langford; Lin Cheng; Arina Kazimianec; Andrea Borghetto; Thomas G Wright; Gary Woodward; Neelam Hassanali; Rowan C Nicholls; Hayley Simpson; Tom Waddell; Siddarth Vikal; Marija Mavar; Soubera Rymell; Ioan Wigley; Jaco Jacobs; Matt Kelly; Rajarshi Banerjee; J Michael Brady
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 4.813

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.