Literature DB >> 20498536

Relationship between liver function and liver signal intensity in hepatobiliary phase of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Taku Tajima1, Hidemasa Takao, Hiroyuki Akai, Shigeru Kiryu, Hiroshi Imamura, Yasushi Watanabe, Jyunichi Shibahara, Norihiro Kokudo, Masaaki Akahane, Kuni Ohtomo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of liver function on liver signal intensity in gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in humans and to examine the biochemical factors related to signal intensity in the hepatobiliary phase.
METHODS: This study included 48 patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma or metachronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the chronic liver dysfunction and the normal liver function. All the individuals of both groups had magnetic resonance imaging before injection and at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after bolus administration of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid. The time point when the mean liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) reached a peak was determined for each group, and the mean liver SNR at the peak point was compared between the groups. In all the patients, stepwise multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the liver SNR at the peak time point and the laboratory data, using the following biochemical factors: prothrombin time, total bilirubin level, cholinesterase level, albumin level, creatinine level, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes, and Child-Pugh score.
RESULTS: The mean values of liver SNR increased gradually. The mean liver SNR reached peak at 30 minutes after contrast injection in both groups and was significantly lower in the chronic liver dysfunction group than in the normal liver function group. Indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes was the only significant contributor to the liver signal intensity at the peak time point (30 minutes).
CONCLUSIONS: The degree of liver enhancement in the hepatobiliary phase may reflect liver cell function. The measurement of liver signal intensity in the hepatobiliary phase may be useful in predicting whole and regional hepatic functional reserves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20498536     DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181cd3304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  27 in total

1.  Can functional parameters from hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetate MRI predict clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis?

Authors:  Kumar Sandrasegaran; Enming Cui; Reem Elkady; Pauley Gasparis; Gitasree Borthakur; Mark Tann; Suthat Liangpunsakul
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The inhibitory effect of gadoxetate disodium on hepatic transporters: a study using indocyanine green.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Akai; Koichiro Yasaka; Akira Kunimatsu; Masanori Nojima; Yusuke Inoue; Osamu Abe; Kuni Ohtomo; Shigeru Kiryu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Increase in left liver lobe function after preoperative right portal vein embolisation assessed with gadolinium-EOB-DTPA MRI.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Lutz Lüdemann; Thomas Keuchel; Maciej Malinowski; Daniel Seehofer; Martin Stockmann; Bernd Hamm; Bernhard Gebauer; Timm Denecke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Focal liver lesions detection and characterization: The advantages of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI.

Authors:  Stefano Palmucci
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-07-27

5.  The expression of transporter OATP2/OATP8 decreases in undetectable hepatocellular carcinoma by Gd-EOB-MRI in the explanted cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Masaaki Hidaka; Mitsuhisa Takatsuki; Sadayuki Okudaira; Akihiko Soyama; Izumi Muraoka; Takayuki Tanaka; Izumi Yamaguchi; Takanobu Hara; Hisamitsu Miyaaki; Tatsuki Ichikawa; Tomayoshi Hayashi; Ichiro Sakamoto; Kazuhiko Nakao; Tamotsu Kuroki; Takashi Kanematsu; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 6.047

6.  Quantifying differences in hepatic uptake of the liver specific contrast agents Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA: a pilot study.

Authors:  O Dahlqvist Leinhard; N Dahlström; J Kihlberg; P Sandström; T B Brismar; O Smedby; P Lundberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Assessing liver function by liver enhancement during the hepatobiliary phase with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  N Verloh; M Haimerl; F Zeman; M Schlabeck; A Barreiros; M Loss; A G Schreyer; C Stroszczynski; C Fellner; P Wiggermann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Use of gadoxetate disodium for functional MRI based on its unique molecular mechanism.

Authors:  YoonSeok Choi; Jimi Huh; Dong-Cheol Woo; Kyung Won Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Clinical factors predictive of insufficient liver enhancement on the hepatocyte-phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Kim; Jong Young Choi; Chung-Hwa Park; Myeong Jun Song; Do Seon Song; Chang Wook Kim; Si Hyun Bae; Seung Kew Yoon; Young Joon Lee; Sung Eun Rha
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Effect of lapatinib on hepatic parenchymal enhancement on gadoxetate disodium (EOB)-enhanced MRI scans of the rat liver.

Authors:  Yuko Nakamura; Yutaka Hirokawa; Shigemi Kitamura; Wataru Yamasaki; Koji Arihiro; Fuminari Tatsugami; Makoto Iida; Hideaki Kakizawa; Shuji Date; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.374

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.