Literature DB >> 20497474

Subjective neuronal coding of reward: temporal value discounting and risk.

Wolfram Schultz1.   

Abstract

A key question in the neurobiology of reward relates to the nature of coding. Rewards are objects that are advantageous or necessary for the survival of individuals in a variety of environmental situations. Thus reward appears to depend on the individual and its environment. The question arises whether neuronal systems in humans and monkeys code reward in subjective terms, objective terms or both. The present review addresses this issue by dealing with two important reward processes, namely the individual discounting of reward value across temporal delays, and the processing of information about risky rewards that depends on individual risk attitudes. The subjective value of rewards decreases with the temporal distance to the reward. In experiments using neurophysiology and brain imaging, dopamine neurons and striatal systems discount reward value across temporal delays of a few seconds, despite unchanged objective reward value, suggesting subjective value coding. The subjective values of risky outcomes depend on the risk attitude of individual decision makers; these values decrease for risk-avoiders and increase for risk-seekers. The signal for risk and the signal for the value of risky reward covary with individual risk attitudes in regions of the human prefrontal cortex, suggesting subjective rather than objective coding of risk and risky value. These data demonstrate that important parameters of reward are coded in a subjective manner in key reward structures of the brain. However, these data do not rule out that other neurons or brain structures may code reward according to its objective value and risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20497474     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07282.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  29 in total

1.  Dopaminergic reward system: a short integrative review.

Authors:  Oscar Arias-Carrión; Maria Stamelou; Eric Murillo-Rodríguez; Manuel Menéndez-González; Ernst Pöppel
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Differentiating the rapid actions of cocaine.

Authors:  Roy A Wise; Eugene A Kiyatkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Compassion-based emotion regulation up-regulates experienced positive affect and associated neural networks.

Authors:  Haakon G Engen; Tania Singer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  How to Interpret Resting-State fMRI: Ask Your Participants.

Authors:  Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Julia W Y Kam; Colin W Hoy; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Withdrawal from extended-access cocaine self-administration results in dysregulated functional activity and altered locomotor activity in rats.

Authors:  Erin S Calipari; Thomas J R Beveridge; Sara R Jones; Linda J Porrino
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-13       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Willing to wait: Elevated reward-processing EEG activity associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.

Authors:  Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Neural encoding of choice during a delayed response task in primate striatum and orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Howard C Cromwell; Leon Tremblay; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The missing p in psychiatric training: why it is important to teach pain to psychiatrists.

Authors:  Igor Elman; Jon-Kar Zubieta; David Borsook
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01

Review 9.  Neural mechanisms regulating different forms of risk-related decision-making: Insights from animal models.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; David E Moorman; Jared W Young; Barry Setlow; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 10.  Obesity and Brain Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Kyoungjune Pak; Seong-Jang Kim; In Joo Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.