Literature DB >> 20497164

Physiologic benefits of pulsatile perfusion during mechanical circulatory support for the treatment of acute and chronic heart failure in adults.

Yulong Guan1, Tushar Karkhanis, Shigang Wang, Alan Rider, Steven C Koenig, Mark S Slaughter, Aly El Banayosy, Akif Undar.   

Abstract

A growing population experiencing heart failure (100,000 patients/year), combined with a shortage of donor organs (less than 2200 hearts/year), has led to increased and expanded use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices. MCS devices have successfully improved clinical outcomes, which are comparable with heart transplantation and result in better 1-year survival than optimal medical management therapies. The quality of perfusion provided during MCS therapy may play an important role in patient outcomes. Despite demonstrated physiologic benefits of pulsatile perfusion, continued use or development of pulsatile MCS devices has been widely abandoned in favor of continuous flow pumps owing to the large size and adverse risks events in the former class, which pose issues of thrombogenic surfaces, percutaneous lead infection, and durability. Next-generation MCS device development should ideally implement designs that offer the benefits of rotary pump technology while providing the physiologic benefits of pulsatile end-organ perfusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20497164     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.00996.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  7 in total

1.  Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the pump parameters in the helical flow pump.

Authors:  Kyohei Hosoda; Kohei Ishii; Takashi Isoyama; Itsuro Saito; Yusuke Inoue; Kouki Ariyoshi; Toshiya Ono; Hidemoto Nakagawa; Kou Imachi; Hiroshi Kumagai; Yusuke Abe
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  The helical flow pump with a hydrodynamic levitation impeller.

Authors:  Yusuke Abe; Kohei Ishii; Takashi Isoyama; Itsuro Saito; Yusuke Inoue; Toshiya Ono; Hidemoto Nakagawa; Emiko Nakano; Kyoko Fukazawa; Kazuhiko Ishihara; Kazuyoshi Fukunaga; Minoru Ono; Kou Imachi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 3.  Left ventricular assist device-induced reverse remodeling: it's not just about myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Karolina K Marinescu; Nir Uriel; Douglas L Mann; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 4.  Role of animal models in biomedical research: a review.

Authors:  P Mukherjee; S Roy; D Ghosh; S K Nandi
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Effects of Pulsatile Frequency of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) on Coronary Perfusion: A Numerical Simulation Study.

Authors:  Yuanfei Zhu; Ming Yang; Yan Zhang; Fan Meng; Tianyue Yang; Zhiwei Fang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-09-17

6.  Enhancement of Arterial Pressure Pulsatility by Controlling Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Flow Rate in Mock Circulatory System.

Authors:  Selim Bozkurt; Frans N van de Vosse; Marcel C M Rutten
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 7.  Venovenous Extracorporeal Life Support in Single-Ventricle Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Alison B Nair; Peter Oishi
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.418

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.