BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia worldwide. In Hispanic populations there are few validated tests for the accurate identification and diagnosis of AD. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is an internationally recognized questionnaire used to stage dementia. This study's objective was to develop a linguistic adaptation of the CDR for the Puerto Rican population. METHODS: The linguistic adaptation consisted of the evaluation of each CDR question (item) and the questionnaire's instructions, for similarities in meaning (semantic equivalence), relevance of content (content equivalence), and appropriateness of the questionnaire's format and measuring technique (technical equivalence). A focus group methodology was used to assess cultural relevance, clarity, and suitability of the measuring technique in the Argentinean version of the CDR for use in a Puerto Rican population. RESULTS: A total of 27 semantic equivalence changes were recommended in four categories: higher than 6th grade level of reading, meaning, common use, and word preference. Four content equivalence changes were identified, all focused on improving the applicability of the test questions to the general population's concept of street addresses and common dietary choices. There were no recommendations for changes in the assessment of technical equivalence. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a linguistically adapted CDR instrument for the Puerto Rican population, preserving the semantic, content, and technical equivalences of the original version. Further studies are needed to validate the usefulness of the adapted CDR instrument with the staging of Alzheimer's disease in the Puerto Rican population.
BACKGROUND:Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia worldwide. In Hispanic populations there are few validated tests for the accurate identification and diagnosis of AD. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is an internationally recognized questionnaire used to stage dementia. This study's objective was to develop a linguistic adaptation of the CDR for the Puerto Rican population. METHODS: The linguistic adaptation consisted of the evaluation of each CDR question (item) and the questionnaire's instructions, for similarities in meaning (semantic equivalence), relevance of content (content equivalence), and appropriateness of the questionnaire's format and measuring technique (technical equivalence). A focus group methodology was used to assess cultural relevance, clarity, and suitability of the measuring technique in the Argentinean version of the CDR for use in a Puerto Rican population. RESULTS: A total of 27 semantic equivalence changes were recommended in four categories: higher than 6th grade level of reading, meaning, common use, and word preference. Four content equivalence changes were identified, all focused on improving the applicability of the test questions to the general population's concept of street addresses and common dietary choices. There were no recommendations for changes in the assessment of technical equivalence. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a linguistically adapted CDR instrument for the Puerto Rican population, preserving the semantic, content, and technical equivalences of the original version. Further studies are needed to validate the usefulness of the adapted CDR instrument with the staging of Alzheimer's disease in the Puerto Rican population.
Authors: Leida E Matías-Carrelo; Ligia M Chávez; Gisela Negrón; Glorisa Canino; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Sue Hoppe Journal: Cult Med Psychiatry Date: 2003-09
Authors: Joseph H Lee; Sandra Barral; Rong Cheng; Inara Chacon; Vincent Santana; Jennifer Williamson; Rafael Lantigua; Martin Medrano; Ivonne Z Jimenez-Velazquez; Yaakov Stern; Benjamin Tycko; Ekaterina Rogaeva; Yosuke Wakutani; Toshitaka Kawarai; Peter St George-Hyslop; Richard Mayeux Journal: Neurogenetics Date: 2007-10-17 Impact factor: 2.660
Authors: L Berg; D W McKeel; J P Miller; M Storandt; E H Rubin; J C Morris; J Baty; M Coats; J Norton; A M Goate; J L Price; M Gearing; S S Mirra; A M Saunders Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 1998-03
Authors: L Berg; W L Danziger; M Storandt; L A Coben; M Gado; C P Hughes; J W Knesevich; J Botwinick Journal: Neurology Date: 1984-05 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Miriam Goudsmit; Jos van Campen; Thelma Schilt; Chris Hinnen; Sanne Franzen; Ben Schmand Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra Date: 2018-08-29