Literature DB >> 20495952

Study of return rate and return time of undeliverable postal letters.

Andrea Schmidt-Pokrzywniak1, Andreas Stang.   

Abstract

Postal questionnaires are widely used to collect data in health research and epidemiologic studies. One problem related to mail surveys is the availability of an up-to-date and accurate list of people in the population from which to draw the sample for the survey. For the identification of incorrect postal addresses it is important that all incorrectly addressed mails are returned as undeliverable. This study examines the proportion of unreturned postal letters that were sent to incorrect addresses. We sent 339 letters to existing addresses throughout Germany, but used fictional names name of persons. Three hundred and three letters (98.2%) were returned as undeliverable. The return rates only slightly differed by layout of the envelopes, region and deliverer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20495952     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-010-9463-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  7 in total

1.  [The German Health Survey. 1997/98].

Authors:  B M Bellach; H Knopf; W Thefeld
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  1998-12

Review 2.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

3.  Postal survey on airborne occupational exposure and respiratory disorders in Norway: causes and consequences of non-response.

Authors:  P Bakke; A Gulsvik; P Lilleng; O Overå; R Hanoa; G E Eide
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Incentives increased return rates but did not influence partial nonresponse or treatment outcome in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jörg Dirmaier; Timo Harfst; Uwe Koch; Holger Schulz
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Fate of incorrectly addressed mailed questionnaires.

Authors:  R S Sandler; K L Holland
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.

Authors:  D A Asch; M K Jedrziewski; N A Christakis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 7.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effect of reminders on mitigating participation bias in a case-control study.

Authors:  Clarence C Tam; Craig D Higgins; Laura C Rodrigues
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  The Rotterdam Study: 2012 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; M Arfan Ikram; Harry L A Janssen; Caroline C W Klaver; Ernst J Kuipers; Tamar E C Nijsten; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Jacqueline C M Witteman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 8.082

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.