Jörg Dirmaier1, Timo Harfst, Uwe Koch, Holger Schulz. 1. University Medical Center, Department of Medical Psychology, Martinistrasse 52, Building S35, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. dirmaier@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to analyze monetary incentives and shortening the questionnaire as means of increasing response rates in a mailed follow-up survey 1 year after inpatient psychotherapeutic treatment. Additionally, effects on partial nonresponse and the assessment of treatment outcome were examined. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In a 2x2 factorial design, a sample of 3,825 patients was randomized to the two following interventions: (1) receiving a prepaid monetary incentive or none; and (2) getting a short or a long questionnaire. Treatment outcome was measured prospectively by a self-assessment instrument for psychopathology. RESULTS: When using incentives, the response rate significantly increased by 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-11.9%). Receiving a short questionnaire led to an augmentation of the response rate of 3.7% (95% CI 0.9-8.3%), which was not significant. The corresponding odds ratios were significantly increased for monetary incentives (1.36; 95% CI 1.30-1.88), and when abridging the questionnaire (1.15; 95% CI 1.01-1.31). However, partial nonresponse and treatment outcome were independent of the two factors. CONCLUSION: Incentives and a shorter questionnaire led to higher return rates but did not affect partial nonresponse and self-report of treatment outcome in a randomized postal survey.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to analyze monetary incentives and shortening the questionnaire as means of increasing response rates in a mailed follow-up survey 1 year after inpatient psychotherapeutic treatment. Additionally, effects on partial nonresponse and the assessment of treatment outcome were examined. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In a 2x2 factorial design, a sample of 3,825 patients was randomized to the two following interventions: (1) receiving a prepaid monetary incentive or none; and (2) getting a short or a long questionnaire. Treatment outcome was measured prospectively by a self-assessment instrument for psychopathology. RESULTS: When using incentives, the response rate significantly increased by 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-11.9%). Receiving a short questionnaire led to an augmentation of the response rate of 3.7% (95% CI 0.9-8.3%), which was not significant. The corresponding odds ratios were significantly increased for monetary incentives (1.36; 95% CI 1.30-1.88), and when abridging the questionnaire (1.15; 95% CI 1.01-1.31). However, partial nonresponse and treatment outcome were independent of the two factors. CONCLUSION: Incentives and a shorter questionnaire led to higher return rates but did not affect partial nonresponse and self-report of treatment outcome in a randomized postal survey.
Authors: Hunter Warwick; Carolyn Hutyra; Cary Politzer; Andrew Francis; Thomas Risoli; Cynthia Green; Nikhil Verma; Scott Huettel; Richard C Mather Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Marc H F Schreinemacher; Richard P ten Broek; Erica A Bakkum; Harry van Goor; Nicole D Bouvy Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Shannon Sahlqvist; Yena Song; Fiona Bull; Emma Adams; John Preston; David Ogilvie Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Simon Gates; Mark A Williams; Emma Withers; Esther Williamson; Shahrul Mt-Isa; Sarah E Lamb Journal: Trials Date: 2009-06-22 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-07-08