Literature DB >> 20495076

Impact of optimal follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance on early diagnosis and prevention of myeloma-related complications.

Giada Bianchi1, Robert A Kyle, Colin L Colby, Dirk R Larson, Shaji Kumar, Jerry A Katzmann, Angela Dispenzieri, Terry M Therneau, James R Cerhan, L Joseph Melton, S Vincent Rajkumar.   

Abstract

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is associated with a long-term risk of progression to multiple myeloma (MM) or related malignancy. To prevent serious myeloma-related complications, lifelong annual follow-up has been recommended, but its value is unknown. We reviewed all patients from southeastern Minnesota seen at Mayo Clinic between 1973 and 2004 with MGUS who subsequently progressed to MM. Of 116 patients, 69% had optimal follow-up of MGUS. Among these, abnormalities on serial follow-up laboratory testing led to the diagnosis of MM in 16%, whereas MM was diagnosed only after serious MM-related complications in 45%. In the remaining, workup of less serious symptoms (25%), incidental finding during workup of unrelated medical conditions (11%), and unknown (3%) were the mechanisms leading to MM diagnosis. High-risk MGUS patients (≥ 1.5 g/dL and/or non-IgG MGUS) were more likely to be optimally followed (81% vs 64%), and be diagnosed with MM secondary to serial follow-up testing (21% vs 7%). This retrospective study suggests that routine annual follow-up of MGUS may not be required in low-risk MGUS. Future studies are needed to replicate and expand our findings and to determine the optimal frequency of monitoring in higher-risk MGUS patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20495076      PMCID: PMC2951852          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-277566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  27 in total

1.  Frequency of pathological proteins (M-components) om 6,995 sera from an adult population.

Authors:  U Axelsson; R Bachmann; J Hällén
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1966-02

2.  Frequency of monoclonal gammapathy ('M components') in 13,400 sera from blood donors.

Authors:  J M Fine; P Lambin; P Leroux
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 2.144

3.  Laboratory investigation of monoclonal gammopathy during 10 years of screening in a general hospital.

Authors:  V Malacrida; D De Francesco; G Banfi; F A Porta; P G Riches
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  A comparative study of monoclonal gammopathies and immunoglobulin levels in Japanese and United States elderly.

Authors:  M Bowden; J Crawford; H J Cohen; O Noyama
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Monoclonal gammopathies in the adult population of Finistère, France.

Authors:  J P Saleun; M Vicariot; P Deroff; J F Morin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Thalidomide for previously untreated indolent or smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S V Rajkumar; A Dispenzieri; R Fonseca; M Q Lacy; S Geyer; J A Lust; R A Kyle; P R Greipp; M A Gertz; T E Witzig
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Terry M Therneau; S Vincent Rajkumar; Janice R Offord; Dirk R Larson; Matthew F Plevak; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prognostic factors for malignant transformation in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Clara Cesana; Catherine Klersy; Luciana Barbarano; Anna Maria Nosari; Monica Crugnola; Ester Pungolino; Livio Gargantini; Simonetta Granata; Marina Valentini; Enrica Morra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Long-term follow-up of 241 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: the original Mayo Clinic series 25 years later.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Terry M Therneau; S Vincent Rajkumar; Dirk R Larson; Matthew F Plevak; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.998

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the diagnosis, classification, risk stratification, and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: implications for recategorizing disease entities in the presence of evolving scientific evidence.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Robert A Kyle; Francis K Buadi
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  The clinical relevance and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and related disorders: recommendations from the European Myeloma Network.

Authors:  Niels W C J van de Donk; Antonio Palumbo; Hans Erik Johnsen; Monika Engelhardt; Francesca Gay; Henrik Gregersen; Roman Hajek; Martina Kleber; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Pellegrino Musto; Torben Plesner; Orhan Sezer; Evangelos Terpos; Anders Waage; Sonja Zweegman; Hermann Einsele; Pieter Sonneveld; Henk M Lokhorst
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM).

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.990

4.  [Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and monoclonal B-lymphocytosis].

Authors:  K Hübel; M Hallek
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM): novel biological insights and development of early treatment strategies.

Authors:  Neha Korde; Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  How I manage monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Ronald S Go; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Determining the clinical significance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a SEER-Medicare population analysis.

Authors:  Ronald S Go; Jacob D Gundrum; Joan M Neuner
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-09-28

Review 8.  Does my patient with a serum monoclonal spike have multiple myeloma?

Authors:  Giada Bianchi; Irene M Ghobrial
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.722

9.  Quantification of circulating clonal plasma cells via multiparametric flow cytometry identifies patients with smoldering multiple myeloma at high risk of progression.

Authors:  W I Gonsalves; S V Rajkumar; A Dispenzieri; D Dingli; M M Timm; W G Morice; M Q Lacy; F K Buadi; R S Go; N Leung; P Kapoor; S R Hayman; J A Lust; S J Russell; S R Zeldenrust; L Hwa; T V Kourelis; R A Kyle; M A Gertz; S K Kumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 10.  Smoldering multiple myeloma requiring treatment: time for a new definition?

Authors:  Angela Dispenzieri; A Keith Stewart; Asher Chanan-Khan; S Vincent Rajkumar; Robert A Kyle; Rafael Fonseca; Prashant Kapoor; P Leif Bergsagel; Arleigh McCurdy; Morie A Gertz; Martha Q Lacy; John A Lust; Stephen J Russell; Steven R Zeldenrust; Craig Reeder; Vivek Roy; Francis Buadi; David Dingli; Suzanne R Hayman; Nelson Leung; Yi Lin; Joseph Mikhael; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.