Literature DB >> 11896113

Prognostic factors for malignant transformation in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma.

Clara Cesana1, Catherine Klersy, Luciana Barbarano, Anna Maria Nosari, Monica Crugnola, Ester Pungolino, Livio Gargantini, Simonetta Granata, Marina Valentini, Enrica Morra.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the natural history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), identify early predictors of evolution, and assess whether associated conditions correlate with disease progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,231 consecutive patients with either MGUS (n = 1,104) or SMM (n = 127) diagnosed from July 1975 to March 1998 were included in the study. Cumulative survival probability and cumulative probability of transformation into lymphoproliferative disease were calculated by means of the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to identify possible predictors of malignant evolution.
RESULTS: Cumulative transformation probability at 10 and 15 years was 14% and 30%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 65 months (range, 12 to 239 months), 64 MGUS cases (5.8%) evolved to multiple myeloma (MM) (n = 43), extramedullary plasmacytoma (n = 1), primary amyloidosis (n = 1), Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (n = 12), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 6), and B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 1). At a median follow-up of 72 months (range, 12 to 247 months), 25 SMMs (19.7%) evolved to overt MM. A lower evolution risk was observed in MGUS than in SMM (P <.0001). Greater than 5% marrow plasmacytosis, detectable Bence Jones proteinuria, polyclonal serum immunoglobulin reduction, and high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were independent factors influencing MGUS transformation. SMM progression correlated with greater than 10% marrow plasma cells, detectable Bence Jones proteinuria, and immunoglobulin (Ig) A isotype. Neither concomitant diseases nor immunosuppression correlated with progression.
CONCLUSION: Careful evaluation of marrow plasmacytosis, urinary paraprotein, background immunoglobulins, ESR, and paraprotein isotype might help identify at presentation patients with benign monoclonal gammopathies requiring stricter monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11896113     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  44 in total

1.  Incidental finding of monoclonal gammopathy in blood donors: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Massimo La Raja; Monica Barcobello; Nicola Bet; Paolo Dolfini; Marina Florean; Federica Tomasella; Vincenzo De Angelis; Luca Mascaretti
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Genomic analysis of high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Lucía López-Corral; María Victoria Mateos; Luis A Corchete; María Eugenia Sarasquete; Javier de la Rubia; Felipe de Arriba; Juan-José Lahuerta; Ramón García-Sanz; Jesús F San Miguel; Norma C Gutiérrez
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 4.  The clinical relevance and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and related disorders: recommendations from the European Myeloma Network.

Authors:  Niels W C J van de Donk; Antonio Palumbo; Hans Erik Johnsen; Monika Engelhardt; Francesca Gay; Henrik Gregersen; Roman Hajek; Martina Kleber; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Pellegrino Musto; Torben Plesner; Orhan Sezer; Evangelos Terpos; Anders Waage; Sonja Zweegman; Hermann Einsele; Pieter Sonneveld; Henk M Lokhorst
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM).

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  Immunoglobulin G treatment of secondary immunodeficiencies in the era of novel therapies.

Authors:  M Seppänen
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Timing of treatment of smoldering myeloma: delay until progression.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-13

8.  Short-term outcome and quality of life in kidney transplant recipient with monoclonal gammopathy.

Authors:  Masaaki Yanishi; Hiroyasu Tsukaguchi; Takashi Yoshida; Hisanori Taniguchi; Kenji Yoshida; Takao Mishima; Yoshihiro Komai; Kaneki Yasuda; Masato Watanabe; Motohiko Sugi; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  CEN Case Rep       Date:  2016-04-05

Review 9.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma: a review of the current understanding of epidemiology, biology, risk stratification, and management of myeloma precursor disease.

Authors:  Amit Agarwal; Irene M Ghobrial
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  What is the significance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance?

Authors:  Catherine Atkin; Alex Richter; Elizabeth Sapey
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.659

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.