MOTIVATION: Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) has gained significant traction over the past few years for rapid, high-resolution separations of analytes based upon gas-phase ion structure, with significant potential impacts in the field of proteomic analysis. IMS coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) affords multiple improvements over traditional proteomics techniques, such as in the elucidation of secondary structure information, identification of post-translational modifications, as well as higher identification rates with reduced experiment times. The high throughput nature of this technique benefits from accurate calculation of cross sections, mobilities and associated drift times of peptides, thereby enhancing downstream data analysis. Here, we present a model that uses physicochemical properties of peptides to accurately predict a peptide's drift time directly from its amino acid sequence. This model is used in conjunction with two mathematical techniques, a partial least squares regression and a support vector regression setting. RESULTS: When tested on an experimentally created high confidence database of 8675 peptide sequences with measured drift times, both techniques statistically significantly outperform the intrinsic size parameters-based calculations, the currently held practice in the field, on all charge states (+2, +3 and +4). AVAILABILITY: The software executable, imPredict, is available for download from http:/omics.pnl.gov/software/imPredict.php CONTACT: rds@pnl.gov SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) has gained significant traction over the past few years for rapid, high-resolution separations of analytes based upon gas-phase ion structure, with significant potential impacts in the field of proteomic analysis. IMS coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) affords multiple improvements over traditional proteomics techniques, such as in the elucidation of secondary structure information, identification of post-translational modifications, as well as higher identification rates with reduced experiment times. The high throughput nature of this technique benefits from accurate calculation of cross sections, mobilities and associated drift times of peptides, thereby enhancing downstream data analysis. Here, we present a model that uses physicochemical properties of peptides to accurately predict a peptide's drift time directly from its amino acid sequence. This model is used in conjunction with two mathematical techniques, a partial least squares regression and a support vector regression setting. RESULTS: When tested on an experimentally created high confidence database of 8675 peptide sequences with measured drift times, both techniques statistically significantly outperform the intrinsic size parameters-based calculations, the currently held practice in the field, on all charge states (+2, +3 and +4). AVAILABILITY: The software executable, imPredict, is available for download from http:/omics.pnl.gov/software/imPredict.php CONTACT: rds@pnl.gov SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Ljiljana Pasa-Tolić; Christophe Masselon; Richard C Barry; Yufeng Shen; Richard D Smith Journal: Biotechniques Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 1.993
Authors: Konstantinos Petritis; Lars J Kangas; Bo Yan; Matthew E Monroe; Eric F Strittmatter; Wei-Jun Qian; Joshua N Adkins; Ronald J Moore; Ying Xu; Mary S Lipton; David G Camp; Richard D Smith Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2006-07-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Navdeep Jaitly; Matthew E Monroe; Vladislav A Petyuk; Therese R W Clauss; Joshua N Adkins; Richard D Smith Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Matthew E Monroe; Nikola Tolić; Navdeep Jaitly; Jason L Shaw; Joshua N Adkins; Richard D Smith Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2007-06-01 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Erin Shammel Baker; Brian H Clowers; Fumin Li; Keqi Tang; Aleksey V Tolmachev; David C Prior; Mikhail E Belov; Richard D Smith Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2007-04-06 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson; William R Cannon; Christopher S Oehmen; Anuj R Shah; Vidhya Gurumoorthi; Mary S Lipton; Katrina M Waters Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2008-05-03 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Abhinav Nath; Michael A Zientek; Benjamin J Burke; Ying Jiang; William M Atkins Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2010-09-14 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Annette Bak; Dennis Leung; Stephanie E Barrett; Seth Forster; Ellen C Minnihan; Andrew W Leithead; James Cunningham; Nathalie Toussaint; Louis S Crocker Journal: AAPS J Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Thomas E Angel; Uma K Aryal; Shawna M Hengel; Erin S Baker; Ryan T Kelly; Errol W Robinson; Richard D Smith Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 54.564
Authors: Kevin L Crowell; Erin S Baker; Samuel H Payne; Yehia M Ibrahim; Matthew E Monroe; Gordon W Slysz; Brian L LaMarche; Vladislav A Petyuk; Paul D Piehowski; William F Danielson; Gordon A Anderson; Richard D Smith Journal: Int J Mass Spectrom Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 1.986