Literature DB >> 20494259

Applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in obstetrics.

Gary Fruhman1, Ignatia B Van den Veyver.   

Abstract

Current prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis uses mostly G-banded karyotyping of fetal cells from chorionic villi or amniotic fluid cultures, which readily detects any aneuploidy and larger structural genomic rearrangements that are more than 4 to 5 megabases in size. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is also used for rapid detection of the common aneuploidies seen in liveborns. If there is prior knowledge that increases risk for a specific deletion or duplication syndrome, FISH with a probe specific for the region in question is done. Over the past decade, array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has been developed, which can survey the entire genome for submicroscopic microdeletions and microduplications, in addition to all unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities that are also detected by karyotype. aCGH in essence interrogates the genome with thousands of probes fixed on a slide in a single assay, and has already revolutionized cytogenetic diagnosis in the pediatric population. aCGH is being used increasingly for prenatal diagnosis where it is also beginning to make a significant impact. The authors review here principles of aCGH, its benefits for prenatal diagnosis and associated challenges, primarily the inability to detect balanced chromosomal abnormalities and a small risk for discovery of chromosomal abnormalities of uncertain clinical significance. The superior diagnostic power of aCGH far outweighs these concerns. Furthermore, such issues can be addressed during pre- and posttest counseling, and their impact will further diminish as the technology continues to develop and experience with its prenatal diagnostic use grows. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20494259     DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2010.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8545            Impact factor:   2.844


  10 in total

1.  14q32 deletion syndrome: a clinical report.

Authors:  Erin L Youngs; Majed Dasouki; Merlin G Butler
Journal:  Clin Dysmorphol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.816

2.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Unintended diagnosis of Von Hippel Lindau syndrome using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH): counseling challenges arising from unexpected information.

Authors:  Jennifer Hogan; A Turner; K Tucker; L Warwick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Evolving applications of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Melissa S Savage; Mirella J Mourad; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.927

5.  Prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: post-genomic developments.

Authors:  Sinuhe Hahn; Laird G Jackson; Bernhard G Zimmermann
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 11.117

6.  The utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in developmental and behavioral pediatrics.

Authors:  Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-01-11

Review 7.  Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics.

Authors:  Sara Huston Katsanis; Nicholas Katsanis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  22q11.2 deletions in patients with conotruncal defects: data from 1,610 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Philip J Lupo; Jennifer Garbarini; Stacy Woyciechowski; Sharon Edman; Beverly S Emanuel; Laura E Mitchell; Elizabeth Goldmuntz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Genetic testing on products of conception and its relationship with body mass index.

Authors:  Linlin Wang; Jiawei Xu; Wenbin Niu; Linli Hu; Yile Zhang; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  The current state of prenatal detection of genetic conditions in congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Tina O Findley; Hope Northrup
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2021-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.