Literature DB >> 20494018

Diagnostic characteristics of a serum biomarker in patients with positron emission tomography scans.

Eric L Grogan1, Stephen Deppen, Chad V Pecot, Joe B Putnam, Jonathan C Nesbitt, Yu Shyr, Rama Rajanbabu, Bridget Ory, Eric S Lambright, Pierre P Massion.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery for pulmonary nodules results in a benign diagnosis in 10% to 30% of cases. Computed tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are highly sensitive but less specific. High-risk patients (age > 55 years and smoke > 15 pack-years) for lung cancer with negative FDG-PET scans, or low-risk patients (age < 55 years or smoke < 15 pack-years) with FDG-PET-avid lesions may have higher rates of benign nodules. We hypothesized that our serum biomarker improves diagnostic accuracy by providing greater specificity.
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with pulmonary nodules (< or = 3 cm) were prospectively enrolled. We tested the accuracy of our proteomic biomarker in the serum by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Malignancy rates, contingency tables, sensitivity, and specificity analyses were calculated for the entire group and in a subset of patients at high risk for benign disease.
RESULTS: We identified 46 (79%) lung cancers and 12 (21%) benign lesions. Forty-five nodules were FDG-PET-avid. In 36 high-risk patients with FDG-PET-avid lesions, 32 (89%) had cancer. Of the remaining 22 lower-risk patients, 14 (64%) had cancer (p = 0.02). The serum biomarker sensitivity was 26.1%, specificity was 91.7%, positive predictive value was 92%, negative predictive value was 24%, and overall accuracy was 40%. The serum signature accurately predicted all eight benign nodules in this 22-patient subset.
CONCLUSIONS: The serum protein biomarker has a high specificity. This biomarker has a high positive predictive value but low negative predictive value and may improve noninvasive evaluation of lung nodules. Validation in a larger population is warranted. 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20494018      PMCID: PMC3026702          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  19 in total

1.  Program for the Assessment of Clinical Cancer Tests (PACCT): implementing promising assays into clinical practice.

Authors:  J Milburn Jessup; Tracy G Lively; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.225

2.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening.

Authors:  C I Henschke; D I McCauley; D F Yankelevitz; D P Naidich; G McGuinness; O S Miettinen; D M Libby; M W Pasmantier; J Koizumi; N K Altorki; J P Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-10       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Neuroendocrine and cytokeratin serum markers as prognostic determinants of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Pujol; Xavier Quantin; William Jacot; Jean-Marie Boher; Jean Grenier; Pierre-Jean Lamy
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Identification and validation of a potential lung cancer serum biomarker detected by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight spectra analysis.

Authors:  Brandon A Howard; Michael Z Wang; Michael J Campa; Christina Corro; Michael C Fitzgerald; Edward F Patz
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Clinical utility of serum amyloid A and macrophage migration inhibitory factor as serum biomarkers for the detection of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Nayela Khan; Charles J Cromer; Michael Campa; Edward F Patz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  ProGRP: a new biomarker for small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Rafael Molina; Xavier Filella; Josep M Augé
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.281

7.  Thoracic surgical operations in patients enrolled in a computed tomographic screening trial.

Authors:  Juan A Crestanello; Mark S Allen; James R Jett; Stephen D Cassivi; Francis C Nichols; Stephen J Swensen; Claude Deschamps; Peter C Pairolero
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Prognostic significance of perioperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen in non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of 1,000 consecutive resections for clinical stage I disease.

Authors:  Morihito Okada; Wataru Nishio; Toshihiko Sakamoto; Kazuya Uchino; Tsuyoshi Yuki; Akio Nakagawa; Noriaki Tsubota
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Application of serum SELDI proteomic patterns in diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Shuan-ying Yang; Xue-yuan Xiao; Wang-gang Zhang; Li-juan Zhang; Wei Zhang; Bin Zhou; Guoan Chen; Da-cheng He
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng; Holly Janes; Patrick M Bossuyt; John D Potter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Malcolm V Brock; Jean G Ford; Jonathan M Samet; Simon D Spivack
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.