Literature DB >> 20491968

'After the stroke': patients' and carers' experiences of healthcare after stroke in Scotland.

L Salisbury1, K Wilkie, C Bulley, J Shiels.   

Abstract

We report findings on patients with stroke and carers experiences of the healthcare system in Scotland after stroke. These findings emerged from data collected in a primary qualitative study exploring patients with stroke and carers perception of a Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) Clinic. Rich data emerged in relation to healthcare after stroke as experienced by both patients and carers, highlighting important clinically relevant messages and constituting an important area for dissemination. Thirteen patients with stroke and nine carers consented to participate. Data were collected using face-to-face semi-structured interviews, undertaken in April and May 2007, and analysed using the framework of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). IPA aims to explore in depth the participants lived experiences of a specific phenomenon. An overarching theme of 'After the stroke' was identified. Within this, six sub-themes emerged entitled, (1) 'What is wrong?'; (2) 'Help came quickly'; (3) 'Something is still wrong'; (4) 'In the hospital'; (5) 'I'm taking them home' and (6) 'Back at home'. Interestingly, patients with stroke and carers recalled similar parts of the pathway through the healthcare system after stroke, resulting in the six chronological sub-themes. The data highlighted issues surrounding recognition of stroke symptoms by both participants and professionals; expeditious admission to hospital and stroke unit; consultation during the discharge planning process and access to support and community follow up. Despite the availability of clinical guidelines to direct the management of stroke, this study suggests that the experiences of patients with stroke and carers do not always concur with guideline recommendations. These results highlight that such recommendations do not always transfer into clinical practice. Both clinicians and service managers should consider these issues when delivering care to patients after stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20491968     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00917.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  6 in total

Review 1.  Challenging nurses' cultural competence of disability to improve interpersonal interactions.

Authors:  Cecelia I Roscigno
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.230

2.  "Living with a ball and chain": the experience of stroke for individuals and their caregivers in rural Appalachian Kentucky.

Authors:  Megan M Danzl; Elizabeth G Hunter; Sarah Campbell; Violet Sylvia; Janice Kuperstein; Katherine Maddy; Anne Harrison
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Uncovering treatment burden as a key concept for stroke care: a systematic review of qualitative research.

Authors:  Katie Gallacher; Deborah Morrison; Bhautesh Jani; Sara Macdonald; Carl R May; Victor M Montori; Patricia J Erwin; G David Batty; David T Eton; Peter Langhorne; Frances S Mair
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 4.  The patient's experience of the psychosocial process that influences identity following stroke rehabilitation: a metaethnography.

Authors:  E Hole; B Stubbs; C Roskell; A Soundy
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-28

5.  Experiences and needs of patients on the endovascular therapy pathway after acute ischaemic stroke: Being helpless and next to yourself.

Authors:  Kristina Eiskjær Sørensen; Pia Dreyer; Mads Rasmussen; Claus Z Simonsen; Grethe Andersen
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-10-24

Review 6.  The Unmet Needs of Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.

Authors:  Yunfei Guo; Zhenxiang Zhang; Beilei Lin; Yongxia Mei; Qingxuan Liu; Leyun Zhang; Wenna Wang; Yuan Li; Zhongrong Fu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.