Literature DB >> 20490960

Blunted heart rate response as a predictor of cardiac death in patients undergoing vasodilator stress technetium-99m sestamibi gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Shishir Mathur1, Anuj R Shah, Alan W Ahlberg, Deborah M Katten, Gary V Heller.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic value of a blunted heart rate response (BHR) during ECG-gated vasodilator stress SPECT MPI in relation to ventricular function on long-term cardiovascular events is not well established. We performed this study to evaluate the incremental prognostic value of BHR during pharmacological stress SPECT MPI.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent dipyridamole stress Tc-99m sestamibi ECG-gated SPECT MPI (without exercise) were identified. The ratio of peak stress heart rate to baseline was noted. If the ratio was <1.20, it was considered blunted (BHR). The images were interpreted using the standard ASNC 17 segment model. Patients were followed up for a mean time period of 2.3 +/- 1.5 years.
RESULTS: Sixty-four percent (2,890/4,484) of patients demonstrated BHR during dipyridamole stress testing. Cardiac death, the primary end point, occurred in 6.8% of patients. Patients with BHR had a significantly lower cardiac death-free survival as compared to NO BHR group in total population (83% vs 94%; P < .001) as well as in subgroup with normal ejection fraction (89% vs 96%; P < .001). BHR was an independent predictor of cardiac death after adjusting for multiple clinical, perfusion, and function-related gated SPECT variables.
CONCLUSION: Blunted heart rate response during vasodilator stress SPECT MPI is an important prognostic marker for cardiac death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20490960     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-010-9242-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  21 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 2. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Heart rate response during dipyridamole stress as a predictor of mortality in patients with normal myocardial perfusion and normal electrocardiograms.

Authors:  Rohit Bhatheja; Gary S Francis; Claire E Pothier; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Heart rate variability in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: characteristics and prognostic value.

Authors:  L Fauchier; D Babuty; P Cosnay; M L Autret; J P Fauchier
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Comparison of the chronotropic response to exercise and heart rate recovery in predicting cardiovascular mortality.

Authors:  Jonathan Myers; Swee Y Tan; Joshua Abella; Vikram Aleti; Victor F Froelicher
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2007-04

6.  Slow heart rates and increased risk of cardiac death in middle-aged men.

Authors:  L E Hinkle; S T Carver; A Plakun
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1972-05

7.  Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction.

Authors:  T Sharir; G Germano; X Kang; H C Lewin; R Miranda; I Cohen; R D Agafitei; J D Friedman; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Prognostic impact of hemodynamic response to adenosine in patients older than age 55 years undergoing vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion study.

Authors:  Aiden Abidov; Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; Chee Keong Ng; Ishac Cohen; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-09       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Impaired heart rate response to graded exercise. Prognostic implications of chronotropic incompetence in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  M S Lauer; P M Okin; M G Larson; J C Evans; D Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Influence of chronic renal failure on the heart rate response to dipyridamole in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Andrea De Lorenzo; Ronaldo S L Lima
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.872

View more
  15 in total

1.  The clinical value of single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in cardiac risk stratification of very elderly patients (≥80 years) with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sanjeev U Nair; Alan W Ahlberg; Shishir Mathur; Deborah M Katten; Donna M Polk; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Heart rate response during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging: Mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Heart rate response to regadenoson: Making the case for its value in clinical practice.

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Relationship between gated myocardial perfusion SPECT findings and hemodynamic, electrocardiographic, and heart rate changes after Dipyridamole infusion.

Authors:  Arash Gholoobi; Narjess Ayati; Alireza Baghyari; Mohsen Mouhebati; Baharak Atar; Vahid Reza Dabbagh Kakhki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging … it is time for a change!

Authors:  Sanjeev P Bhavnani; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Cardiovascular imaging in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2016: Part 2 of 2-myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Prognostic value of vasodilator response using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Punitha Arasaratnam; Masoud Sadreddini; Yeung Yam; Vinay Kansal; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli; Rob S Beanlands; Michael E Merhige; Brent A Williams; Emir Veledar; James K Min; Li Chen; Terrence D Ruddy; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Leslee J Shaw; Benjamin J W Chow
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Prognostic value of heart rate response during regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end stage renal disease.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Tania Campagnoli; Ibtihaj Fughhi; Marwan Wassouf; Amjad Ali; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.