Literature DB >> 17446799

Comparison of the chronotropic response to exercise and heart rate recovery in predicting cardiovascular mortality.

Jonathan Myers1, Swee Y Tan, Joshua Abella, Vikram Aleti, Victor F Froelicher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both an impaired capacity to increase heart rate during exercise testing (chronotropic incompetence), and a slowed rate of recovery following exercise (heart rate recovery) have been shown to be associated with all-cause mortality. It is, however, unknown which of these responses more powerfully predicts risk, and few data are available on their association with cardiovascular mortality or how they are influenced by beta-blockade.
METHODS: Routine symptom-limited exercise treadmill tests performed on 1910 male veterans at the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Medical Center from 1992 to 2002 were analyzed. Heart rate was determined each minute during exercise and recovery. Chronotropic incompetence was defined as the inability to achieve > or =80% of heart rate reserve, using a population-specific equation for age-predicted maximal heart rate. An abnormal heart rate recovery was considered to be a decrease of <22 beats/min at 2 min in recovery. Cox proportional hazards analyses including pretest clinical data, chronotropic incompetence, heart rate recovery, the Duke Treadmill Score (abnormal defined as <4), and other exercise test responses were performed to determine their association with cardiovascular mortality.
RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 5.1+/-2.1 years, there were 70 deaths from cardiovascular causes. Both abnormal heart rate recovery and chronotropic incompetence were associated with higher cardiovascular mortality, a lower exercise capacity, and more frequent occurrence of angina during exercise. Both heart rate recovery and chronotropic incompetence were stronger predictors of risk than pretest clinical data and traditional risk markers. Multivariately, chronotropic incompetence was similar to the Duke Treadmill Score for predicting cardiovascular mortality, and was a stronger predictor than heart rate recovery [hazard ratios 3.0 (95% confidence interval 1.9-4.9), 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.7-4.8), and 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.1-3.5) for abnormal Duke Treadmill Score, chronotropic incompetence, and abnormal heart rate recovery, respectively]. Having both chronotropic incompetence and abnormal heart rate recovery strongly predicted cardiovascular death, resulting in a relative risk of 4.2 compared with both responses being normal. Beta-blockade had minimal impact on the prognostic power of chronotropic incompetence and heart rate recovery.
CONCLUSION: Both chronotropic incompetence and heart rate recovery predict cardiovascular mortality in patients referred for exercise testing for clinical reasons. Chronotropic incompetence was a stronger predictor of cardiovascular mortality than heart rate recovery, but risk was most powerfully stratified by these two responses together. The simple application of heart rate provides powerful risk stratification for cardiovascular mortality from the exercise test, and should be routinely included in the test report.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17446799     DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328088cb92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil        ISSN: 1741-8267


  40 in total

1.  High-intensity interval training and hypertension: maximizing the benefits of exercise?

Authors:  Emmanuel Gomes Ciolac
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012-05-15

2.  Usefulness of the integrated scoring model of treadmill tests to predict myocardial ischemia and silent myocardial ischemia in community-dwelling adults (from the Rancho Bernardo study).

Authors:  Joong-Il Park; So-Young Shin; Sue K Park; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Obstructive Sleep Apnea Impairs Postexercise Sympathovagal Balance in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Felipe X Cepeda; Edgar Toschi-Dias; Cristiane Maki-Nunes; Maria Urbana P B Rondon; Maria Janieire N N Alves; Ana Maria F W Braga; Daniel G Martinez; Luciano F Drager; Geraldo Lorenzi-Filho; Carlos E Negrao; Ivani C Trombetta
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Heart Rate Recovery 10 Seconds After Cessation of Exercise Predicts Death.

Authors:  Yordi J van de Vegte; Pim van der Harst; Niek Verweij
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Influence of the maximum heart rate attained during exercise testing on subsequent heart rate recovery.

Authors:  Sina Zaim; Joel Schesser; Linda S Hirsch; Ronald Rockland
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Revisiting age-predicted maximal heart rate: Can it be used as a valid measure of effort?

Authors:  Ross Arena; Jonathan Myers; Leonard A Kaminsky
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 7.  Cardiovascular recovery from psychological and physiological challenge and risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Vanessa Panaite; Kristen Salomon; Alvin Jin; Jonathan Rottenberg
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 8.  The Effects of Chronic Aerobic Exercise on Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Emily M Miele; Samuel A E Headley
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 9.  Heart rate control with adrenergic blockade: clinical outcomes in cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  David Feldman; Terry S Elton; Doron M Menachemi; Randy K Wexler
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-06-01

10.  Improvements in heart rate recovery among women after cardiac rehabilitation completion.

Authors:  Theresa M Beckie; Jason W Beckstead; Kevin E Kip; Gerald Fletcher
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.