BACKGROUND: Since there is no established measure for autism in India, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy, reliability and validity of Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). METHODS: Children and adolescents suspected of having autism were identified from the unit's database. Scale and item level scores of CARS were collected and analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values for various CARS cut-off scores were calculated. Test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability of CARS were examined. The dichotomized CARS score was correlated with the ICD-10 clinical diagnosis of autism to establish the criterion validity of CARS as a measure of autism. Convergent and divergent validity was calculated. The factor structure of CARS was demonstrated by principal components analysis. RESULTS: A CARS score of > or =33 (sensitivity = 81.4%, specificity = 78.6%; area under the curve = 81%) was suggested for diagnostic use in Indian populations. The inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.74) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.81) for CARS were good. Besides the adequate face and content validity, CARS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.79) and item-total correlation. There was moderate convergent validity with Binet-Kamat Test of Intelligence or Gessell's Developmental Schedule (r=0.42; P=0.01), divergent validity (r=-0.18; P=0.4) with ADD-H Comprehensive Teacher Rating Scale, and high concordance rate with the reference standard, ICD-10 diagnosis (82.52%; Cohen's kappa=0.40, P=0.001) in classifying autism. A 5-factor structure explained 65.34% of variance. CONCLUSION: The CARS has strong psychometric properties and is now available for clinical and research work in India.
BACKGROUND: Since there is no established measure for autism in India, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy, reliability and validity of Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). METHODS:Children and adolescents suspected of having autism were identified from the unit's database. Scale and item level scores of CARS were collected and analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values for various CARS cut-off scores were calculated. Test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability of CARS were examined. The dichotomized CARS score was correlated with the ICD-10 clinical diagnosis of autism to establish the criterion validity of CARS as a measure of autism. Convergent and divergent validity was calculated. The factor structure of CARS was demonstrated by principal components analysis. RESULTS: A CARS score of > or =33 (sensitivity = 81.4%, specificity = 78.6%; area under the curve = 81%) was suggested for diagnostic use in Indian populations. The inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.74) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.81) for CARS were good. Besides the adequate face and content validity, CARS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.79) and item-total correlation. There was moderate convergent validity with Binet-Kamat Test of Intelligence or Gessell's Developmental Schedule (r=0.42; P=0.01), divergent validity (r=-0.18; P=0.4) with ADD-H Comprehensive Teacher Rating Scale, and high concordance rate with the reference standard, ICD-10 diagnosis (82.52%; Cohen's kappa=0.40, P=0.001) in classifying autism. A 5-factor structure explained 65.34% of variance. CONCLUSION: The CARS has strong psychometric properties and is now available for clinical and research work in India.
Authors: Peter Szatmari; Chantal Mérette; Susan E Bryson; Jacques Thivierge; Marc-Andre Roy; Mireille Cayer; Michel Maziade Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: M K C Nair; Paul Swamidhas Sudhakar Russell; Babu George; G L Prasanna; A O Mini; M L Leena; Sushila Russell; K A Minju Journal: Indian J Pediatr Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Tanya Elizabeth Benjamin; Jewel Elias Crasta; Ann Patricia Catherine Suresh; Merlin Jemi Thanka Alwinesh; Gomathi Kanniappan; Sanjeev M Padankatti; M K C Nair; Paul Swamidhas Sudhakar Russell Journal: Indian J Pediatr Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Babu George; M S Razeena Padmam; M K C Nair; M L Leena; G L Prasanna; Paul Swamidhas Sudhakar Russell Journal: Indian J Pediatr Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Sherab Tsheringla; K A Minju; Sushila Russell; Priya Mammen; Paul Swamidhas Sudhakar Russell; M K C Nair Journal: Indian J Pediatr Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Jewel Elias Crasta; Tanya Elizabeth Benjamin; Ann Patricia Catherine Suresh; Merlin Thanka Jemi Alwinesh; Gomathi Kanniappan; Sanjeev M Padankatti; Paul Swamidhas Sudhakar Russell; M K C Nair Journal: Indian J Pediatr Date: 2014-11-22 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Dejan B Budimirovic; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Craig A Erickson; Scott S Hall; David Hessl; Allan L Reiss; Margaret K King; Leonard Abbeduto; Walter E Kaufmann Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 4.025