Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) is claimed to be superior to the standard technique, due to the potential reduction of soft tissue damage via a smaller and tissue-sparing approach. As a result of the lack of objective evidence of fewer muscle and tendon defects, controversy still remains as to whether minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty truly minimizes muscle and tendon damage. Therefore, the objective was to compare the influence of the surgical approach on abductor muscle trauma and to analyze the relevance to postoperative pain and functional recovery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2006 and July 2007, 44 patients with primary hip arthritis were prospectively included in the study protocol. Patients underwent cementless unilateral total hip arthroplasty either through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach (ALMI) (n = 21) or a modified direct lateral approach (mDL) (n = 16). Patients were evaluated clinically and underwent MR imaging preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Clinical assessment contained clinical examination, performance of abduction test and the survey of a function score using the Harris Hip Score, a pain score using a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0-10, as well as a satisfaction score using an NRS of 1-6. Additionally, myoglobin and creatine kinase were measured preoperatively, and 6, 24 and 96 h postoperatively. Evaluation of the MRI images included fatty atrophy (rating scale 0-4), tendon defects (present/absent) and bursal fluid collection of the abductor muscle.
RESULTS: Muscle and tendon damage occurred in both groups, but more lateral gluteus medius tendon defects [mDL 3/12mth.: 6 (37%)/4 (25%); ALMI: 3 (14%)/2 (9%)] and muscle atrophy in the anterior part of the gluteus medius [mean-standard (12): 1.75 ± 1.8; mean-MIS (12): 0.98 ± 1.1] were found in patients with the mDL approach. The clinical outcome was also poorer compared to the ALMI group. Significantly, more Trendelenburg's signs were evident and lower clinical scores were achieved in the mDL group. No differences in muscle and tendon damage were found for the gluteus minimus muscle. A higher serum myoglobin concentration was measured 6 and 24 h postoperatively in the mDL group (6 h: 403 ± 168 μg/l; 24 h: 304 ± 182 μg/l) compared to the ALMI group (6 h: 331 ± 143 μg/l; 24 h: 268 ± 145 μg/l).
CONCLUSION: Abductor muscle and tendon damage occurred in both approaches, but the gluteus medius muscle can be spared more successfully via the minimally invasive approach and is accompanied by a better clinical outcome. Therefore, going through the intermuscular plane, without any detachment or dissection of muscle and tendons, truly minimizes perioperative soft tissue trauma. Furthermore, MRI emerges as an important imaging modality in the evaluation of muscle trauma in THA.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes