Literature DB >> 20490463

Induction of DNA strand breaks by dental composite components compared to X-ray exposure in human gingival fibroblasts.

Jürgen Durner1, Małgorzata Dębiak, Alexander Bürkle, Reinhard Hickel, Franz-Xaver Reichl.   

Abstract

The toxicity of dental composites has been attributed to the release of residual monomers from polymerized resin-based composites due to degradation processes or incomplete polymerization. Some of these eluted substances have a genotoxic potential. We tested the hypothesis that realistic concentrations (and/or worst case concentrations/situations) of bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate (BisGMA), triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) found in elution experiments can cause DNA strand breaks in human gingival fibroblasts (HGF). Such DNA damage was compared with that resulting from ionizing radiation coming from natural sources, dental radiography or tumor therapy. TEGDMA, HEMA and MMA did not induce DNA strand breaks at concentrations of up to 10 mM. About 24 h after incubation with 0.25 mM BisGMA, significantly more DNA strand breaks were found in HGF compared to controls. DNA strand breaks caused by 0.25 mM BisGMA, correspond to DNA strand breakage caused by irradiation with 4 Gy, only used in the high single-dose irradiation tumor therapy. But 0.25 mM BisGMA is more than 100-fold higher than that concentration found in worst case calculations. Therefore, our data did not support our hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20490463     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-010-0558-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  8 in total

1.  Investigation on synthesis and properties of isosorbide based bis-GMA analogue.

Authors:  Jan Łukaszczyk; Bartosz Janicki; Achim Frick
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  In vitro studies on the cytotoxic potential of surface sealants.

Authors:  S Zingler; B Matthei; A Kohl; D Saure; B Ludwig; K Diercke; C J Lux; R Erber
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Release and toxicity of dental resin composite.

Authors:  Saurabh K Gupta; Payal Saxena; Vandana A Pant; Aditya B Pant
Journal:  Toxicol Int       Date:  2012-09

4.  Protective effect of chitosan oligosaccharide lactate against DNA double-strand breaks induced by a model methacrylate dental adhesive.

Authors:  Joanna Szczepanska; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Ewelina Synowiec; Piotr Czarny; Marek Rekas; Janusz Blasiak; Jacek Pawel Szaflik
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-08

5.  Current developments in toxicology.

Authors:  J D Stewart; R Marchan
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.068

6.  Key messages of recent publications in the field of toxicology.

Authors:  C Cadenas; R Marchan; P Godoy; R Reif; I von Recklinghausen; N Schöbel
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.068

7.  Once Resin Composites and Dental Sealants Release Bisphenol-A, How Might This Affect Our Clinical Management?-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anabela Baptista Paula; Debbie Toste; Alfredo Marinho; Inês Amaro; Carlos-Miguel Marto; Ana Coelho; Manuel Marques-Ferreira; Eunice Carrilho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of methacrylate-based orthodontic adhesives.

Authors:  Andreas Taubmann; Ines Willershausen; Christian Walter; Sarah Al-Maawi; Bernd Kaina; Lina Gölz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.573

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.