Literature DB >> 20489409

Micro- and macromechanical effects on the wound bed of negative pressure wound therapy using gauze and foam.

Ola Borgquist1, Lotta Gustafsson, Richard Ingemansson, Malin Malmsjö.   

Abstract

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) results in 2 types of tissue deformation, macrodeformation (ie, wound contraction) and microdeformation (ie, the interaction of tissue and dressing on a microscopic level). These effects have been delineated for one type of wound filler, foam, but not for gauze. The mechanical deformation initiates a signaling cascade which ultimately leads to wound healing. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of gauze and foam on macro- and microdeformation during treatment with negative pressure. An in vivo porcine peripheral wound model was used. NPWT was applied for 72 hours at 0, -75, and -125 mm Hg, using either foam or gauze as wound filler. The mechanical effects of NPWT were examined by measuring the wound surface area reduction and by histologic analysis of the wound bed tissue. Similar degrees of wound contraction (macrodeformation) were seen during NPWT regardless if foam or gauze was used. After negative pressure had been discontinued, the wound stayed contracted. There was no difference in wound contraction between -75 and -125 mm Hg. Biopsies of the wound bed revealed a repeating pattern of wound surface undulations and small tissue blebs ("tissue mushrooms") were pulled into the pores of the foam dressing and the spaces between the threads in the gauze dressing (microdeformation). This pattern was obvious in wounds treated both with foam and gauze, at atmospheric pressure (0 mm Hg) as well as at subatmospheric pressures (-75 and -125 mm Hg). The degrees of micro- and macrodeformation of the wound bed are similar after NPWT regardless if foam or gauze is used as wound filler.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20489409     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181ba578a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of bacteria and fungus-binding mesh, foam and gauze as fillers in negative pressure wound therapy--pressure transduction, wound edge contraction, microvascular blood flow and fluid retention.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Richard Ingemansson; Sandra Lindstedt; Lotta Gustafsson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Infection in conflict wounded.

Authors:  W G P Eardley; K V Brown; T J Bonner; A D Green; J C Clasper
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy to infected deep sternotomy wound complicated by cardiac tamponade: a case report.

Authors:  Chanaka Rajakaruna; Adrian Marchbank
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  The influence of different sizes and types of wound fillers on wound contraction and tissue pressure during negative pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  Nicolas Kairinos; Donald Anthony Hudson; Michael Solomons
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Negative pressure wound therapy using gauze and foam: histological, immunohistochemical and ultrasonography morphological analysis of the granulation tissue and scar tissue. Preliminary report of a clinical study.

Authors:  Marco Fraccalvieri; Enrico Zingarelli; Erind Ruka; Umberto Antoniotti; Renato Coda; Antonino Sarno; Maria Alessandra Bocchiotti; Stefano Bruschi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  A novel vacuum assisted closure therapy model for use with percutaneous devices.

Authors:  Saranne J Cook; Francesca R Nichols; Lucille B Brunker; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infections: Bacterial Cultures from Negative-Pressure-Wound-Therapy Foams Do Not Improve Diagnostics.

Authors:  Alexandra U Scherrer; Guido Bloemberg; Reinhard Zbinden; Annelies S Zinkernagel; Claudio Fuchs; Sandra Frauenfelder; Zoran Rancic; Dieter Mayer; Barbara Hasse
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Deconstructing negative pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  Shadi Lalezari; Christine J Lee; Anna A Borovikova; Derek A Banyard; Keyianoosh Z Paydar; Garrett A Wirth; Alan D Widgerow
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Negative pressure wound therapy-assisted dermatotraction for the closure of large open wounds in a patient with non-clostridial gas gangrene.

Authors:  Kenichiro Ishida; Mitsuhiro Noborio; Tetsuro Nishimura; Yohei Ieki; Yumiko Shimahara; Taku Sogabe; Naoki Ehara; Yuki Saoyama; Daikai Sadamitsu
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2015-06-30

10.  Mechanical effects of negative pressure wound therapy on abdominal wounds - effects of different pressures and wound fillers.

Authors:  Christian Torbrand; Erik Anesäter; Ola Borgquist; Malin Malmsjö
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.