Literature DB >> 20489393

Trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales: a psychometric assessment using classical test theory and rasch analysis.

Pamela Gallagher1, F Franchignoni, A Giordano, M MacLachlan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a detailed psychometric analysis using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis of the three main scales of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) in people with a lower-limb amputation.
DESIGN: A sample of 498 persons who were prosthesis users with a lower-limb amputation was retrospectively studied, pooled from a number of studies undertaken across the United Kingdom and Ireland in the past decade in which the TAPES had been completed as part of a postal survey. Both factor analysis techniques and Rasch analysis were performed on TAPES data. Dimensionality, item fit to the model, response category performance, and internal construct validity were assessed. Category collapsing and item removal were considered to improve the questionnaire.
RESULTS: The analyses suggested to restructure the TAPES as follows: (a) three psychosocial adjustment subscales with a four-point rating scale (and a reworded item); (b) an activity restriction scale based on ten items with their original three-point rating scale; and (c) two satisfaction with the prosthesis subscales using a three-point rating scale. All scales and subscales showed acceptable internal consistency and ability to define a distinct hierarchy of persons along the measured construct.
CONCLUSIONS: This study empirically identified a revised version of the TAPES (TAPES-R) with a simplified general structure and psychometrically suitable for assessing the complex experience of amputation and adjustment to a lower-limb prosthesis. Additional studies are needed to confirm and further explore its measurement properties in other samples, thereby adding clinical validity to the instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20489393     DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181dd8cf1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  15 in total

1.  Functional and psychosocial status of Haitians who became users of lower extremity prostheses as a result of the 2010 earthquake.

Authors:  Marilys G Randolph; Leonard Elbaum; Pey-Shan Wen; Denis Brunt; Jessy Larsen; Anahid Kulwicki; Mario De la Rosa
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2014-10-01

2.  Postamputation Cognitive Impairment Is Related to Worse Perceived Physical Function Among Middle-Aged and Older Prosthesis Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Miller; Rashelle M Hoffman; Laura A Swink; Deborah E Barnes; Cory L Christiansen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Adults with unilateral lower-limb amputation: greater spatial extent of pain is associated with worse adjustment, greater activity restrictions, and less prosthesis satisfaction.

Authors:  Jaclyn Megan Sions; Emma Haldane Beisheim-Ryan; Ryan Todd Pohlig; Mayank Seth
Journal:  Scand J Pain       Date:  2022-02-01

4.  Theoretical implementation of prior knowledge in the design of a multi-scale prosthesis satisfaction questionnaire.

Authors:  Tim Schürmann; Philipp Beckerle; Julia Preller; Joachim Vogt; Oliver Christ
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Towards active lower limb prosthetic systems: design issues and solutions.

Authors:  Oliver Christ; Philipp Beckerle
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Evaluation of EMG pattern recognition for upper limb prosthesis control: a case study in comparison with direct myoelectric control.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; He Helen Huang; Anna Winslow; Dustin L Crouch; Fan Zhang; Nancy Wolk
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Laboratory- and community-based health outcomes in people with transtibial amputation using crossover and energy-storing prosthetic feet: A randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Sara J Morgan; Cody L McDonald; Elizabeth G Halsne; Sarah M Cheever; Rana Salem; Patricia A Kramer; Brian J Hafner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Initial Clinical Evaluation of the Modular Prosthetic Limb.

Authors:  Briana N Perry; Courtney W Moran; Robert S Armiger; Paul F Pasquina; Jamie W Vandersea; Jack W Tsao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Leg Prosthesis With Somatosensory Feedback Reduces Phantom Limb Pain and Increases Functionality.

Authors:  Caroline Dietrich; Sandra Nehrdich; Sandra Seifert; Kathrin R Blume; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Gunther O Hofmann; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: A systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires.

Authors:  Erwin C Baars; Ernst Schrier; Pieter U Dijkstra; Jan H B Geertzen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.