Jaclyn Megan Sions1, Emma Haldane Beisheim-Ryan1,2, Ryan Todd Pohlig3, Mayank Seth1. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA. 2. VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA. 3. Biostatistics Core, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study's primary purpose was to determine if the extent of bodily pain, as evaluated with pain body diagrams, is associated with prosthetic-related activity restrictions, adjustment, and satisfaction among adults with a major unilateral lower-limb amputation. A secondary objective was to evaluate between-days, test-retest reliability for pain body diagrams among adults with lower-limb amputation. METHODS: Adults with a lower-limb amputation that occurred ≥1 year prior participated in an online, cross-sectional research study. Outcome measures included pain body diagrams and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised, which evaluates post-amputation activity restrictions, psychosocial adjustment, and prosthesis satisfaction. Linear regression modeling was used to evaluate associations between the number of painful body regions and prosthetic outcomes, after considering covariates (alpha ≤ 0.010). A subset of participants recompleted pain body diagrams to evaluate between-days, test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Data from 74 participants (n = 32 female; n = 42 transtibial-level; n = 27 traumatic etiology) were available. Beyond covariates (i.e., age, sex, amputation level), the total number of painful body regions was significantly associated with all Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised subscales (p < 0.001-0.006), with the exception of Social Adjustment (p = 0.764). The total number of painful body regions explained 14.5, 11.8, 11.6, and 7.4% of the variance in Functional Satisfaction with the Prosthesis, Adjustment to Limitation, General Adjustment, and Activity Restriction, respectively. In a subset (n = 54), test-retest reliability for total number of painful body regions per body diagrams was good [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)3,1 = 0.84]. CONCLUSIONS: A greater number of painful body regions is associated with greater activity restriction, worse adjustment, and lower prosthesis satisfaction, supporting the need to enhance post-amputation pain management and both amputated- and secondary-site pain prevention. ETHICAL COMMITTEE NUMBER: IRB #1611862.
OBJECTIVES: This study's primary purpose was to determine if the extent of bodily pain, as evaluated with pain body diagrams, is associated with prosthetic-related activity restrictions, adjustment, and satisfaction among adults with a major unilateral lower-limb amputation. A secondary objective was to evaluate between-days, test-retest reliability for pain body diagrams among adults with lower-limb amputation. METHODS: Adults with a lower-limb amputation that occurred ≥1 year prior participated in an online, cross-sectional research study. Outcome measures included pain body diagrams and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised, which evaluates post-amputation activity restrictions, psychosocial adjustment, and prosthesis satisfaction. Linear regression modeling was used to evaluate associations between the number of painful body regions and prosthetic outcomes, after considering covariates (alpha ≤ 0.010). A subset of participants recompleted pain body diagrams to evaluate between-days, test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Data from 74 participants (n = 32 female; n = 42 transtibial-level; n = 27 traumatic etiology) were available. Beyond covariates (i.e., age, sex, amputation level), the total number of painful body regions was significantly associated with all Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised subscales (p < 0.001-0.006), with the exception of Social Adjustment (p = 0.764). The total number of painful body regions explained 14.5, 11.8, 11.6, and 7.4% of the variance in Functional Satisfaction with the Prosthesis, Adjustment to Limitation, General Adjustment, and Activity Restriction, respectively. In a subset (n = 54), test-retest reliability for total number of painful body regions per body diagrams was good [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)3,1 = 0.84]. CONCLUSIONS: A greater number of painful body regions is associated with greater activity restriction, worse adjustment, and lower prosthesis satisfaction, supporting the need to enhance post-amputation pain management and both amputated- and secondary-site pain prevention. ETHICAL COMMITTEE NUMBER: IRB #1611862.
Authors: Kevin Döring; Carmen Trost; Christoph Hofer; Martin Salzer; Tryphon Kelaridis; Reinhard Windhager; Gerhard M Hobusch Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Majid Artus; Paul Campbell; Christian D Mallen; Kate M Dunn; Danielle A W van der Windt Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Saurja Thapa; Robert H Shmerling; Jonathan F Bean; Yurun Cai; Suzanne G Leveille Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.636