OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the 2008 English public antibiotic campaigns. METHODS: English and Scottish (acting as controls) adults aged > or = 15 years were questioned face to face about their attitudes to and use of antibiotics, in January 2008 (1888) before and in January 2009 (1830) after the antibiotic campaigns. RESULTS: Among English respondents, there was a small increase in recollection of campaign posters (2009 23.7% versus 2008 19.2%; P = 0.03), but this increase was only 2.3% higher in England than in Scotland. We did not detect any improvement in either England or Scotland, or any differences between England and Scotland in the understanding of the lack of benefit of antibiotics for coughs and colds, and we found no improvement in antibiotic use. We detected a significant increase in respondents retaining leftover antibiotics. Over 20% reported discussing antibiotics with their general practitioner (GP) or nurse in the year to January 2009. The offer of a delayed antibiotic prescription was reported significantly more often by English respondents (19% versus 8% Scottish in 2009; P = 0.01), and English respondents were advised to use other remedies for coughs and colds significantly more often in the year to January 2009 (12.7% in 2009 versus 7.4% in 2008; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence that the 2008 public antibiotic campaigns were effective. The use and visibility of future campaign materials needs auditing. A carefully planned approach that targets the public in GP waiting rooms and through clinicians in consultations may be a more effective way of improving prudent antibiotic use.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the 2008 English public antibiotic campaigns. METHODS: English and Scottish (acting as controls) adults aged > or = 15 years were questioned face to face about their attitudes to and use of antibiotics, in January 2008 (1888) before and in January 2009 (1830) after the antibiotic campaigns. RESULTS: Among English respondents, there was a small increase in recollection of campaign posters (2009 23.7% versus 2008 19.2%; P = 0.03), but this increase was only 2.3% higher in England than in Scotland. We did not detect any improvement in either England or Scotland, or any differences between England and Scotland in the understanding of the lack of benefit of antibiotics for coughs and colds, and we found no improvement in antibiotic use. We detected a significant increase in respondents retaining leftover antibiotics. Over 20% reported discussing antibiotics with their general practitioner (GP) or nurse in the year to January 2009. The offer of a delayed antibiotic prescription was reported significantly more often by English respondents (19% versus 8% Scottish in 2009; P = 0.01), and English respondents were advised to use other remedies for coughs and colds significantly more often in the year to January 2009 (12.7% in 2009 versus 7.4% in 2008; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence that the 2008 public antibiotic campaigns were effective. The use and visibility of future campaign materials needs auditing. A carefully planned approach that targets the public in GP waiting rooms and through clinicians in consultations may be a more effective way of improving prudent antibiotic use.
Authors: Christopher C Butler; Sharon A Simpson; Frank Dunstan; Stephen Rollnick; David Cohen; David Gillespie; Meirion R Evans; M Fasihul Alam; Marie-Jet Bekkers; John Evans; Laurence Moore; Robin Howe; Jamie Hayes; Monika Hare; Kerenza Hood Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-02-02
Authors: Cliodna McNulty; Puja Joshi; Chris C Butler; Lou Atkinson; Tom Nichols; Angela Hogan; David French Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sarah Wilding; Virpi Kettu; Wendy Thompson; Philip Howard; Lars J C Jeuken; Madeleine Pownall; Mark Conner; Jonathan A T Sandoe Journal: JAC Antimicrob Resist Date: 2021-06-17