BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infection (RTI) is the commonest indication for community antibiotic prescriptions. Prescribing is rising and is influenced by patients' consulting behaviour and beliefs. AIM: To build up a profile of the 'RTI clinical iceberg' by exploring how the general public manage RTI, visit GPs and why. DESIGN AND SETTING: Two-phase qualitative and quantitative study in England. METHOD: Qualitative interviews with 17 participants with acute RTI visiting pharmacies in England, and face-to-face questionnaire survey of 1767 adults ≥15 years in households in England during January 2011. RESULTS: Qualitative interviews: interviewees with RTI visited GPs if they considered their symptoms were prolonged, or severe enough to cause pain, or interfered with daily activities or sleep. Questionnaire: 58% reported having had an RTI in the previous 6 months, and 19.7% (95% CI = 16.8 to 22.9%) of these contacted or visited their GP surgery for this, most commonly because 'the symptoms were severe'; or 'after several days the symptoms hadn't improved'; 10.3% of those experiencing an RTI (or 53.1% of those contacting their GP about it) expected an antibiotic prescription. Responders were more likely to believe antibiotics would be effective for a cough with green rather than clear phlegm. Perceptions of side effects of antibiotics did not influence expectations for antibiotics. Almost all who reported asking for an antibiotic were prescribed one, but 25% did not finish them. CONCLUSION: One-fifth of those with an RTI contact their GP and most who ask for antibiotics are prescribed them. A better public understanding about the lack of benefit of antibiotics for most RTIs and addressing concerns about illness duration and severity, could reduce GP consultations and antibiotic prescriptions for RTI.
BACKGROUND:Respiratory tract infection (RTI) is the commonest indication for community antibiotic prescriptions. Prescribing is rising and is influenced by patients' consulting behaviour and beliefs. AIM: To build up a profile of the 'RTI clinical iceberg' by exploring how the general public manage RTI, visit GPs and why. DESIGN AND SETTING: Two-phase qualitative and quantitative study in England. METHOD: Qualitative interviews with 17 participants with acute RTI visiting pharmacies in England, and face-to-face questionnaire survey of 1767 adults ≥15 years in households in England during January 2011. RESULTS: Qualitative interviews: interviewees with RTI visited GPs if they considered their symptoms were prolonged, or severe enough to cause pain, or interfered with daily activities or sleep. Questionnaire: 58% reported having had an RTI in the previous 6 months, and 19.7% (95% CI = 16.8 to 22.9%) of these contacted or visited their GP surgery for this, most commonly because 'the symptoms were severe'; or 'after several days the symptoms hadn't improved'; 10.3% of those experiencing an RTI (or 53.1% of those contacting their GP about it) expected an antibiotic prescription. Responders were more likely to believe antibiotics would be effective for a cough with green rather than clear phlegm. Perceptions of side effects of antibiotics did not influence expectations for antibiotics. Almost all who reported asking for an antibiotic were prescribed one, but 25% did not finish them. CONCLUSION: One-fifth of those with an RTI contact their GP and most who ask for antibiotics are prescribed them. A better public understanding about the lack of benefit of antibiotics for most RTIs and addressing concerns about illness duration and severity, could reduce GP consultations and antibiotic prescriptions for RTI.
Authors: Remo Ostini; Desley Hegney; Claire Jackson; Margaret Williamson; Judith M Mackson; Karin Gurman; Wayne Hall; Susan E Tett Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Nick A Francis; David Gillespie; Jacqueline Nuttall; Kerenza Hood; Paul Little; Theo Verheij; Samuel Coenen; Jochen W Cals; Herman Goossens; Christopher C Butler Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: C C Butler; M J Kelly; K Hood; T Schaberg; H Melbye; M Serra-Prat; F Blasi; P Little; T Verheij; S Mölstad; M Godycki-Cwirko; P Edwards; J Almirall; A Torres; U-M Rautakorpi; J Nuttall; H Goossens; S Coenen Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Cliodna McNulty; Puja Joshi; Chris C Butler; Lou Atkinson; Tom Nichols; Angela Hogan; David French Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Tau-Hong Lee; Joshua Gx Wong; David Cb Lye; Mark Ic Chen; Victor Wk Loh; Yee-Sin Leo; Linda K Lee; Angela Lp Chow Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Annegret Schneider; Christie Cabral; Natalie Herd; Alastair Hay; Joanna May Kesten; Emma Anderson; Isabel Lane; Charles Beck; Susan Michie Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Kathryn O'Brien; Thomas Wyn Bellis; Mark Kelson; Kerenza Hood; Christopher C Butler; Adrian Edwards Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 5.386