Literature DB >> 20488690

Dosimetric analysis of 3D image-guided HDR brachytherapy planning for the treatment of cervical cancer: is point A-based dose prescription still valid in image-guided brachytherapy?

Hayeon Kim1, Sushil Beriwal, Chris Houser, M Saiful Huq.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the dosimetric outcome of 3D image-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer treatment and compare dose coverage of high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) to traditional Point A dose. Thirty-two patients with stage IA2-IIIB cervical cancer were treated using computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging-based image-guided HDR brachytherapy (IGBT). Brachytherapy dose prescription was 5.0-6.0 Gy per fraction for a total 5 fractions. The HRCTV and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated following the GYN GEC/ESTRO guidelines. Total doses for HRCTV, OARs, Point A, and Point T from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy were summated and normalized to a biologically equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). The total planned D90 for HRCTV was 80-85 Gy, whereas the dose to 2 mL of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid was limited to 85 Gy, 75 Gy, and 75 Gy, respectively. The mean D90 and its standard deviation for HRCTV was 83.2 ± 4.3 Gy. This is significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than the mean value of the dose to Point A (78.6 ± 4.4 Gy). The dose levels of the OARs were within acceptable limits for most patients. The mean dose to 2 mL of bladder was 78.0 ± 6.2 Gy, whereas the mean dose to rectum and sigmoid were 57.2 ± 4.4 Gy and 66.9 ± 6.1 Gy, respectively. Image-based 3D brachytherapy provides adequate dose coverage to HRCTV, with acceptable dose to OARs in most patients. Dose to Point A was found to be significantly lower than the D90 for HRCTV calculated using the image-based technique. Paradigm shift from 2D point dose dosimetry to IGBT in HDR cervical cancer treatment needs advanced concept of evaluation in dosimetry with clinical outcome data about whether this approach improves local control and/or decreases toxicities.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20488690     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  8 in total

Review 1.  Image-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  John A Vargo; Sushil Beriwal
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

2.  Outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation.

Authors:  Aba Anoa Scott; Joel Yarney; Verna Vanderpuye; Charles Akoto Aidoo; Mervin Agyeman; Samuel Ntiamoah Boateng; Evans Sasu; Kwabena Anarfi; Tony Obeng-Mensah
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: initiating a program.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Joann I Prisciandaro; Abraam Soliman; Ananth Ravi; William Y Song
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-10-30

4.  Clinical implementation of MR-guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Shruti Jolly; James M Balter; Yue Cao; Katherine E Maturen; Lisa Young; Tong Zhu; Joann I Prisciandaro
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Comparative Analysis of 60Co and 192Ir Sources in High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Aiping Wen; Xianliang Wang; Bingjie Wang; Chuanjun Yan; Jingyue Luo; Pei Wang; Jie Li
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy): a pictorial essay focused on radiologist management.

Authors:  Luca Tagliaferri; Benedetta Gui; Luca Russo; Valentina Lancellotta; Maura Miccò; Bruno Fionda; Giacomo Avesani; Angeles Rovirosa; Piotr Wojcieszek; Giovanni Scambia; Riccardo Manfredi
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2022-06-30

7.  Different effects of bladder distention on point A-based and 3D-conformal intracavitary brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Sang Gyu Ju; Seung Jae Huh; Jung Suk Shin; Won Park; Heerim Nam; Sunhyun Bae; Dongryul Oh; Chae-Seon Hong; Jin Sung Kim; Youngyih Han; Doo Ho Choi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Dosimetric evaluation of Point A and volume-based high-dose-rate plans: a single institution study on adaptive brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Arun George Paul; Adrian Nalichowski; Judith Abrams; Peter Paximadis; Ling Zhuang; Steven Miller
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-06-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.