Literature DB >> 24407374

The value of plasma D-dimer level on admission in predicting no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term prognosis in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Ayhan Erkol1, Vecih Oduncu, Burak Turan, Alev Kılıçgedik, Dicle Sırma, Gökhan Gözübüyük, Can Yücel Karabay, Ahmet Guler, Cihan Dündar, Kürşat Tigen, Selçuk Pala, Cevat Kırma.   

Abstract

D-dimer is a final product of fibrin degradation and gives an indirect estimation of the thrombotic burden. We aimed to investigate the value of plasma D-dimer levels on admission in predicting no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) and long-term prognosis in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We retrospectively involved 569 patients treated with p-PCI for acute STEMIs. We prospectively followed up the patients for a median duration of 38 months. Angiographic no-reflow was defined as postprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade <3 or TIMI 3 with a myocardial blush grade <2. Electrocardiographic no-reflow was defined as ST-segment resolution <70%. The primary clinical end points were mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The incidences of angiographic and electrocardiographic no-reflow were 31 and 39% respectively. At multivariable analysis, D-dimer was found to be an independent predictor of both angiographic (p < 0.001), and electrocardiographic (p < 0.001) no-reflow. Both mortality (from Q1 to Q4, 5.7, 6.4, 11.3 and 34.1%, respectively, p < 0.001) and MACE (from Q1 to Q4, 17.9, 29.3, 36.9 and 52.2%, respectively, p < 0.001) rates at long-term follow-up were highest in patients with admission D-dimer levels in the highest quartile (Q4), compared to the rates in other quartiles. However, Cox proportional hazard model revealed that high D-dimer on admission (Q4) was not an independent predictor of mortality or MACE. In contrast, electrocardiographic no-reflow was independently predictive of both mortality [Hazard ratio (HR) 2.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-8.58, p = 0.041] and MACE [HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.32-4.71, p = 0.042]. In conclusion, plasma D-dimer level on admission independently predicts no-reflow after p-PCI. However, D-dimer has no independent prognostic value in patients with STEMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24407374     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-013-1044-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  30 in total

1.  Distal embolization during primary angioplasty: histopathologic features and predictability.

Authors:  Ugo Limbruno; Marco De Carlo; Sabina Pistolesi; Andrea Micheli; Anna Sonia Petronio; Tiziano Camacci; Gabriella Fontanini; Alberto Balbarini; Mario Mariani; Raffaele De Caterina
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Prevention and treatment of microvascular obstruction-related myocardial injury and coronary no-reflow following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Ronen Jaffe; Alexander Dick; Bradley H Strauss
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Angiographic morphologic features of infarct-related arteries and timely reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: predictors of slow-flow and no-reflow phenomenon.

Authors:  Hon-Kan Yip; Mien-Cheng Chen; Hsueh-Wen Chang; Chi-Ling Hang; Yuan-Kai Hsieh; Chih-Yuan Fang; Chiung-Jen Wu
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Coagulation indicators in chronic stable effort angina and unstable angina: relationship with acute phase reactants and clinical outcome.

Authors:  N Fiotti; A Di Chiara; N Altamura; M Miccio; P Fioretti; G Guarnieri; C Giansante
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.276

5.  Increased plasma concentration of cross-linked fibrin polymers in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C W Francis; D G Connaghan; W L Scott; V J Marder
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Prognostic value of a multimarker approach for patients presenting to hospital with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Conor J McCann; Ben M Glover; Ian B A Menown; Michael J Moore; Jane McEneny; Colum G Owens; Bernie Smith; Peter C Sharpe; Ian S Young; Jennifer A Adgey
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.

Authors:  Ellen C Keeley; Judith A Boura; Cindy L Grines
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  D-dimer levels predict ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes after acute myocardial infarction: a HORIZONS-AMI biomarker substudy.

Authors:  Wouter J Kikkert; Bimmer E Claessen; Gregg W Stone; Roxana Mehran; Bernhard Witzenbichler; Bruce R Brodie; Jochen Wöhrle; Adam Witkowski; Giulio Guagliumi; Krzysztof Zmudka; José P S Henriques; Jan G P Tijssen; Elias A Sanidas; Vasiliki Chantziara; Ke Xu; George D Dangas
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

Authors:  A W van 't Hof; A Liem; H Suryapranata; J C Hoorntje; M J de Boer; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-06-16       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Coronary no-reflow phenomenon: from the experimental laboratory to the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Shereif H Rezkalla; Robert A Kloner
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  14 in total

1.  Gender-Specific Predictive Markers of Poor Prognosis for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction During a 6-Month Follow-up.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Jianhua Yao; Yuan Xie; Ming Luo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Prognostic Value of D-dimer in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Runzhen Chen; Chen Liu; Peng Zhou; Yu Tan; Zhaoxue Sheng; Jiannan Li; Jinying Zhou; Yi Chen; Li Song; Hanjun Zhao; Hongbing Yan
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2021-05-07

3.  The Value of Combining Plasma D-Dimer and Endothelin-1 Levels to Predict No-Reflow After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of ST-Segment Elevation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with a Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus History.

Authors:  Ronghua Gao; Jianjun Wang; Shaohui Zhang; Guoliang Yang; Zhencai Gao; Xueying Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-05-28

4.  miRNA‑145 inhibits myocardial infarction‑induced apoptosis through autophagy via Akt3/mTOR signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Liqiu Yan; Nan Guo; Yanchao Cao; Saitian Zeng; Jiawang Wang; Fengfeng Lv; Yunfei Wang; Xufen Cao
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.101

5.  Hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome: adjustment of GRACE score by D-dimer enables a more accurate prediction in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tongtong Yu; Yundi Jiao; Jia Song; Dongxu He; Jiake Wu; Zhijun Sun; Zhaoqing Sun
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Gender-Related Difference in D-Dimer Level Predicts In-Hospital Heart Failure after Primary PCI for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Li Li; Wei Wang; Tai Li; Ying Sun; Yanjun Gao; Lin Wang; Heng-Chen Yao
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.434

7.  D-dimer for risk stratification and antithrombotic treatment management in acute coronary syndrome patients: asystematic review and metanalysis.

Authors:  Flavio Giuseppe Biccirè; Alessio Farcomeni; Carlo Gaudio; Pasquale Pignatelli; Gaetano Tanzilli; Daniele Pastori
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2021-12-18

8.  The Value of Pre-Infarction Angina and Plasma D-Dimer in Predicting No-Reflow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhang; Baohua Qiu; Yan Zhang; Yanjun Cao; Xia Zhang; Zhiguo Wu; Shujing Wang; Lianlian Mei
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-07-01

9.  Predictive values of D-dimer for the long-term prognosis of acute ST-segment elevation infarction: A retrospective study in southwestern China.

Authors:  Qi Zhou; Yuzhou Xue; Jian Shen; Wei Zhou; Yi Wen; Suxin Luo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Predictive value of admission D-dimer for contrast-induced acute kidney injury and poor outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Kai-Yang Lin; Han-Chuan Chen; Hui Jiang; Sun-Ying Wang; Hong-Mei Chen; Zhi-Yong Wu; Feng Jiang; Yan-Song Guo; Peng-Li Zhu
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.